Suppr超能文献

门诊手术中心与门诊医院对比:颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术患者报销情况比较

Ambulatory surgery center versus outpatient hospitals: a comparison of reimbursements for patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

作者信息

Herrera Michael, Sacks Brittany, Laurore Charles, Ahmed Wasil, Tiao Justin, Meyers James, Stern Brocha Z, Poeran Jashvant, Chaudhary Saad

机构信息

Leni and Peter W. May Department of Orthopaedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 5 East 98th St, New York, NY 10029, USA.

Institute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Department of Population Health Science & Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Avenue, Box 1077, New York, NY 10029, USA.

出版信息

Spine J. 2025 Mar;25(3):439-452. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.032. Epub 2024 Oct 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

While some studies have demonstrated that ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) are associated with reduced costs of orthopedic procedures, there is no consensus in the current literature as to the impact of ASCs versus hospital-based outpatient departments (HOPDs) on anterior cervical discectomies and fusions (ACDFs).

PURPOSE

This study sought to (1) compare immediate procedure reimbursements, patient out-of-pocket expenditures, and surgeon reimbursements for ACDFs performed at ASCs versus HOPDs and (2) identify factors predicting facility utilization.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

We identified ACDF procedures performed at an ASC or HOPD in commercially-insured patients aged 18 to 64.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Payment variables were calculated from claims within 3 days preoperatively and postoperatively.

METHODS

Multivariable regression models assessed (1) associations between the surgery setting and payment variables and (2) factors associated with the surgery setting.

RESULTS

We included 18,191 ACDFs (14.8% ASC, 85.2% HOPD). In multivariable analyses, ACDFs performed in an ASC (versus HOPD) were associated with 9.8% higher immediate procedure reimbursements (95% CI:7.5%-12.2%), 17.2% higher patient out-of-pocket expenditures (95% CI:11.8-22.8), and 11.7% higher surgeon reimbursements (95% CI:9.18-14.2; all p<.01) (all p<.001). Surgery setting utilization varied by region, insurance-related factors, comorbidities, and procedural complexity.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that ASCs had significantly higher reimbursements compared to HOPDs. Regional variations in ASC utilization imply there are opportunities for standardization of care.

摘要

背景

虽然一些研究表明,门诊手术中心(ASC)与骨科手术成本降低有关,但目前文献中对于ASC与医院门诊科室(HOPD)在前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)方面的影响尚无共识。

目的

本研究旨在(1)比较在ASC与HOPD进行ACDF手术的即时手术报销费用、患者自付费用和外科医生报销费用,以及(2)确定预测医疗机构使用情况的因素。

研究设计

回顾性横断面研究。

患者样本

我们确定了在ASC或HOPD对18至64岁商业保险患者进行的ACDF手术。

结果测量

支付变量根据术前和术后3天内的索赔计算得出。

方法

多变量回归模型评估(1)手术环境与支付变量之间的关联,以及(2)与手术环境相关的因素。

结果

我们纳入了18191例ACDF手术(14.8%在ASC,85.2%在HOPD)。在多变量分析中,在ASC进行的ACDF手术(与HOPD相比)与即时手术报销费用高9.8%(95%CI:7.5%-12.2%)、患者自付费用高17.2%(95%CI:11.8%-22.8%)和外科医生报销费用高11.7%(95%CI:9.18%-14.2%;所有p<0.01)相关(所有p<0.001)。手术环境的使用因地区、保险相关因素、合并症和手术复杂性而异。

结论

我们发现,与HOPD相比,ASC的报销费用显著更高。ASC使用情况的地区差异意味着护理标准化存在机会。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

5
6
Patient Out-of-Pocket Cost Burden With Elective Orthopaedic Surgery.择期骨科手术患者的自付费用负担。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Jul 15;30(14):669-675. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00085. Epub 2022 Jun 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验