Gomez-Lavin Javier
Philosophy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2025 Jan-Feb;16(1):e1696. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1696. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
Working memory is thought to be the psychological capacity that enables us to maintain or manipulate information no longer in our environment for goal-directed action. Recent work argues that working memory is not a so-called natural kind and in turn cannot explain the cognitive processes attributed to it. This paper first clarifies the scope of this earlier critique and argues for a pluralist account of working memory. Under this account, working memory is variously realized by many mechanisms that contribute to the maintenance and manipulation of information across tasks. This view in effect updates one of the earliest pluralist formulations of working memory. Juxtaposing this view against deflationary descriptions allows us to delineate two gradients that help us chart various accounts of working memory and identify their respective theoretical commitments. In turn, we can isolate those accounts that fail to accord with the evidence supporting a pluralist view, and we can begin to rehabilitate working memory as a pluralist, and ultimately more informative, construct.
工作记忆被认为是一种心理能力,它使我们能够在不再处于我们所处环境中的情况下,为了目标导向的行动而维持或操控信息。最近的研究认为,工作记忆并非所谓的自然类别,因而无法解释归因于它的认知过程。本文首先阐明了这一早期批评的范围,并主张对工作记忆采用多元主义的解释。根据这种解释,工作记忆通过许多有助于跨任务维持和操控信息的机制以多种方式实现。这种观点实际上更新了最早的关于工作记忆的多元主义表述之一。将这种观点与贬损性描述并列,使我们能够勾勒出两个梯度,这有助于我们梳理关于工作记忆的各种解释,并确定它们各自的理论前提。相应地,我们可以找出那些与支持多元主义观点的证据不符的解释,并且我们可以开始将工作记忆恢复为一种多元主义的、最终更具信息量的概念。