Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Department of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Nov 1;8(6). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkae099.
Posttreatment surveillance affects millions of cancer survivors, but empiric data to guide clinical practice are lacking. This study assessed whether the intensity of surveillance testing after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer is associated with overall survival.
Men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer between 2005 and 2010 who underwent radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy at a Commission on Cancer-accredited facility were randomly sampled. Primary data collected from 10 147 patients sampled across 1007 facilities were linked with existing data from the National Cancer Database. Analysis examined whether intensity of surveillance measured as the number of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests in the first year after primary treatment (categorized as 0-1 [low intensity], 2 [medium], or ≥3 [high intensity] PSA tests) was associated with overall survival. Secondary outcomes included recurrence-free survival (RFS) and subsequent use of imaging tests, biopsy procedures, and salvage treatment.
Median follow-up exceeded 8 years from prostate cancer diagnosis. Overall survival was not statistically significantly different across surveillance intensity groups among radiation therapy (P = .59) or radical prostatectomy (P = .29) patients. RFS was not statistically significantly different across surveillance intensity groups for radiation therapy (P = .13) patients but was for radical prostatectomy (P = .01) patients with high intensity associated with the worst RFS. In both treatments, higher surveillance intensity was associated with more procedures and salvage treatments.
In patients with localized prostate cancer, more frequent PSA surveillance testing after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy was associated with increased procedures and salvage treatments but not overall survival.
治疗后监测影响着数以百万计的癌症幸存者,但缺乏指导临床实践的经验数据。本研究评估了根治性前列腺切除术或放疗治疗局限性前列腺癌后监测检测的强度是否与总生存相关。
从接受根治性前列腺切除术或放疗的癌症委员会认证机构诊断为局限性前列腺癌的男性中随机抽取。从 1007 个机构中抽取的 10147 名患者的原始数据与国家癌症数据库中的现有数据相链接。分析考察了在初级治疗后第一年测量的监测强度(作为前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测的数量进行分类,0-1 [低强度]、2 [中强度]或≥3 [高强度] PSA 检测)是否与总生存相关。次要结果包括无复发生存(RFS)和随后使用成像检查、活检程序和挽救性治疗。
从前列腺癌诊断到中位随访时间超过 8 年。在放疗(P =.59)或根治性前列腺切除术(P =.29)患者中,监测强度组之间的总生存无统计学差异。放疗(P =.13)患者的 RFS 在监测强度组之间无统计学差异,但高强度的 RFS 与最差的 RFS 相关。在两种治疗方法中,更高的监测强度与更多的程序和挽救性治疗相关。
在局限性前列腺癌患者中,根治性前列腺切除术或放疗后更频繁的 PSA 监测检测与更多的程序和挽救性治疗相关,但与总生存无关。