Department of Psychology, University of South Florida.
School of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, San Diego State University.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Oct;153(10):2359-2377. doi: 10.1037/xge0001633.
Theories of reading posit that decisions about "where" and "when" to move the eyes are driven by visual and linguistic factors, extracted from the perceptual span and word identification span, respectively. We tested this hypothesized dissociation by masking, outside of a visible window, either the spaces between the words (to assess the perceptual span, Experiment 1) or the letters within the words (to assess the word identification span, Experiment 2). We also investigated whether deaf readers' previously reported larger reading span was specifically linked to one of these spans. We analyzed reading rate to test overall reading efficiency, as well as average saccade length to test "where" decisions and average fixation duration to test "when" decisions. Both hearing and deaf readers' perceptual spans extended between 10 and 14 characters, and their word identification spans extended to eight characters to the right of fixation. Despite similar sized rightward spans, deaf readers read more efficiently overall and showed a larger increase in reading rate when leftward text was available, suggesting they attend more to leftward information. Neither rightward span was specifically related to where or when decisions for either group. Our results challenge the assumed dissociation between type of reading span and type of saccade decision and indicate that reading efficiency requires access to both perceptual and linguistic information in the parafovea. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
阅读理论假设,关于“何处”和“何时”移动眼睛的决策是由视觉和语言因素驱动的,分别从感知跨度和单词识别跨度中提取。我们通过掩蔽(在可见窗口之外)来测试这种假设的分离,掩蔽的位置分别是单词之间的空间(以评估感知跨度,实验 1)或单词内的字母(以评估单词识别跨度,实验 2)。我们还研究了聋人读者先前报告的较大阅读跨度是否与这些跨度中的一个特定相关。我们分析了阅读速度以测试整体阅读效率,以及平均眼跳长度以测试“何处”决策和平均注视持续时间以测试“何时”决策。听力和聋人读者的感知跨度都在 10 到 14 个字符之间,他们的单词识别跨度在注视点右侧延伸到 8 个字符。尽管右向跨度相似,聋人读者的整体阅读效率更高,并且当左侧文本可用时阅读速度提高幅度更大,这表明他们更关注左侧信息。对于这两个群体,没有一个右向跨度与“何处”或“何时”决策有特定关系。我们的结果挑战了阅读跨度类型和眼跳决策类型之间的假设分离,并表明阅读效率需要在视区中同时访问感知和语言信息。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。