• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估老年友好社区倡议:开发用于评估的新型调查工具。

Assessing Age-Friendly Community Initiatives: Developing a Novel Survey Tool for Assessment and Evaluation.

机构信息

Centre for Studies in Aging and Health, Providence Care Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Health Quality Programs, School of Nursing, Queen's University, Kington, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2024 Dec 1;64(12). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae146.

DOI:10.1093/geront/gnae146
PMID:39422571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11586661/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Age-friendly community initiatives (AFCIs) have gained recognition as essential responses to the needs of aging populations. Despite their growing significance, there is a notable lack of effective measurement tools to assess the planning, implementation, and sustainability of AFCIs. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a survey tool for evaluating AFCIs.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A sequential exploratory mixed-method design was used in 2 phases. First, we identified key themes from interviews with AFCI leads to generate AFCI survey items and regional workshops. Then, we conducted a pilot of the survey and assessed its measurement properties.

RESULTS

Thematic analysis of interviews with 68 key informants from 58 AFCIs revealed 4 main themes: AFCI priorities, enablers, challenges, and benefits. These themes, combined with feedback from AFCI stakeholders at the regional workshops and an AFCI conference, informed the development and refinement of a reliable and valid AFCI survey in 2019, supported by a high Cronbach's alpha value (α = 0.881). Steps were identified to maintain and sustain the AFCI survey over time.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

The survey accommodates AFCIs' diverse demographics, governance structures, and priorities with a standardized and flexible approach for effective measurement. This research contributes to the academic understanding of AFCIs and aids community leaders and policy-makers in planning, implementing, and evaluating AFCIs.

摘要

背景和目的

老年友好社区倡议(AFCIs)已被视为满足人口老龄化需求的重要对策而受到认可。尽管它们的重要性日益增加,但缺乏有效的衡量工具来评估 AFCIs 的规划、实施和可持续性。本研究旨在开发和验证一种用于评估 AFCIs 的调查工具。

研究设计和方法

采用序贯探索性混合方法设计,分两个阶段进行。首先,我们从对 58 个 AFCIs 的领导的访谈中确定了关键主题,以生成 AFCIs 调查项目和区域研讨会。然后,我们进行了调查试点,并评估了其测量特性。

结果

对来自 58 个 AFCIs 的 68 名关键信息提供者的访谈进行的主题分析揭示了 4 个主要主题:AFCIs 的优先事项、促成因素、挑战和收益。这些主题,结合来自区域研讨会和 AFCIs 会议的 AFCIs 利益相关者的反馈,为 2019 年开发和完善可靠且有效的 AFCIs 调查提供了信息,该调查得到了较高的克朗巴赫α值(α=0.881)的支持。确定了维持和维持 AFCIs 调查随时间推移的步骤。

讨论和意义

该调查以标准化和灵活的方法适应 AFCIs 的多样化人口统计学、治理结构和优先事项,实现了有效的测量。这项研究有助于对 AFCIs 的学术理解,并为社区领导人和政策制定者规划、实施和评估 AFCIs 提供帮助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c34/11586661/3bba7542ad2d/gnae146_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c34/11586661/9a3091c903ed/gnae146_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c34/11586661/3bba7542ad2d/gnae146_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c34/11586661/9a3091c903ed/gnae146_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c34/11586661/3bba7542ad2d/gnae146_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing Age-Friendly Community Initiatives: Developing a Novel Survey Tool for Assessment and Evaluation.评估老年友好社区倡议:开发用于评估的新型调查工具。
Gerontologist. 2024 Dec 1;64(12). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae146.
2
Getting Started: An Empirically Derived Logic Model for Age-Friendly Community Initiatives in the Early Planning Phase.入门指南:早期规划阶段针对友善型社区倡议的经验性推导逻辑模型
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2018 Apr;61(3):295-312. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2018.1432736. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
3
Age-friendly community initiatives: conceptual issues and key questions.老年友好型社区倡议:概念问题与关键问题
Gerontologist. 2015 Apr;55(2):191-8. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv005. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
4
Giving, Receiving, and Doing Together: Interorganizational Interactions in Age-Friendly Community Initiatives.共同给予、接受与行动:老年友好型社区倡议中的组织间互动
J Aging Soc Policy. 2022 Mar 4;34(2):218-236. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2021.2024412. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
5
Responding to Local Needs by Mobilizing Community Assets: Age-Friendly Community Initiatives During the COVID-19 Pandemic.响应本地需求,调动社区资产:应对 COVID-19 大流行的老年友好社区倡议。
Gerontologist. 2022 Nov 30;62(10):1431-1442. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac070.
6
Multidimensional Evaluation of the Process of Constructing Age-Friendly Communities Among Different Aged Community Residents in Beijing, China: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.中国北京不同年龄段社区居民构建老年友好型社区过程的多维评估:横断面问卷调查研究
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025 Mar 21;11:e66248. doi: 10.2196/66248.
7
Developing an indicator for community-level age-friendly communities: the Japan gerontological evaluation study.制定社区层面老年友好型社区指标:日本老年学评估研究
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Apr 26;25(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05919-4.
8
Developing indicators for evaluation of age-friendly communities in Canada: process and results.制定加拿大老年友好社区评估指标:过程和结果。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2016 Oct;36(10):214-223. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.36.10.02.
9
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
10
Developing the Person-Place Fit Measure for Older Adults: Broadening Place Domains.开发老年人的人地适配度测量方法:拓展场所范畴
Gerontologist. 2020 Nov 23;60(8):548-558. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz112.