Immunomodulation and Vaccines Focus Area, Vaccine Research Theme, Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Immunomodulation and Vaccines Focus Area, Vaccine Research Theme, Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda; Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Lancet Glob Health. 2024 Nov;12(11):e1849-e1859. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00282-1.
Immune responses induced by several important vaccines differ between populations, with reduced responses in low-income and rural settings compared with high-income and urban settings. BCG immunisation boosts immune responses to some unrelated vaccines in high-income populations. We aimed to test the hypothesis that BCG revaccination can enhance responses to unrelated vaccines in Ugandan schoolchildren.
We conducted an open-label, randomised controlled trial to compare the effects of BCG revaccination versus no BCG revaccination on the immunogenicity of subsequent unrelated vaccines among adolescents aged 13-17 years who are participants in an urban Ugandan birth cohort study, in which BCG vaccination was documented at birth. Participants were excluded if they had received any of the trial vaccines or related agents when aged 5 years or older. Computer-generated 1:1 randomisation was implemented in REDCap. Participants were excluded if they were concurrently enrolled in other trials; had a clinically significant history of immunodeficiency, or serious psychiatric conditions or moderate to severe acute illnesses; were taking immunosuppressive medications; had allergies to vaccine components, a predisposition towards developing keloid scarring; positive HIV tests or pregnancy tests; were female participants who were lactating; or if they planned to use investigational drugs, vaccines, blood products, or any combination thereof. Trial participants assigned to the BCG revaccination group received the live parenteral BCG-Russia vaccine (Serum Institute of India, Pune, India; 0·1 mL intradermally, right upper arm) at week 0. All participants received yellow fever vaccine (YF-17D; Sanofi Pasteur, Lyon, France; 0·5 mL intramuscularly, left upper arm), live oral typhoid vaccine (Ty21a; PaxVax, London, UK; one capsule per day taken for three alternate days), and quadrivalent virus-like particle human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine (Merck, Rahway, NJ, USA; 0·5 mL intramuscularly, left upper arm) at week 4; and toxoid vaccines (tetanus-diphtheria; Serum Institute of India; 0·5 mL intramuscularly, left upper arm) and an HPV booster at week 28. An additional HPV vaccination at week 8 was provided to female participants older than 14 years who had not previously been vaccinated. The primary outcomes were yellow fever neutralising antibody titres at 4 weeks post-YF-17D vaccination, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (henceforth S Typhi) O-lipopolysaccharide (O:LPS)-specific IgG concentration at 4 weeks post-Ty21a vaccination, and HPV-16 and HPV-18 L1 protein-specific IgG concentration at 4 weeks post-HPV vaccination. Primary outcome assays were conducted at week 8, and at week 52 for tetanus-diphtheria. We conducted an intention-to-treat analysis comparing log-transformed outcomes between trial groups, with results back-transformed to geometric mean ratios (GMRs). The safety population comprised all randomly allocated participants. The trial was registered at the ISRCTN Registry (ISRCTN10482904) and is complete.
Between Aug 31 and Oct 12, 2020, we screened 376 potential participants for eligibility. We enrolled and randomly allocated 300 participants to the two groups (151 [50%] to the BCG group and 149 [50%] to the no BCG group). 178 (59%) of 300 participants were male and 122 (41%) were female. 142 (91%) of 151 participants in the BCG group and 139 (93%) of 149 in the no BCG group completed follow-up. There was no effect of BCG revaccination, compared with no BCG revaccination, on the response observed for any vaccine. Yellow fever plaque reduction neutralising reference tests (PRNT) titres (the reciprocal of the last plasma dilution that reduced by 50%) had a GMR of 0·95 (95% CI 0·75-1·19; p=0·62) and PRNT (reciprocal of the last plasma dilution that reduced by 90%) had a GMR of 0·94 (0·74-1·19; p=0·60); IgG to S Typhi O:LPS was 0·99 (0·80-1·23; p=0·94); IgG to HPV-16 was 0·97 (0·69-1·35; p=0·85) and to HPV-18 was 1·03 (0·76-1·40; p=0·83); and toxoid-specific IgG for tetanus was 1·13 (0·87-1·47; p=0·36) and was 1·00 (0·87-1·16; p=0·97) for diphtheria. There were no serious adverse events in either group.
We found no evidence that BCG revaccination is an effective strategy to improve immunogenicity of other vaccines in this low-income, urban setting.
UK Medical Research Council.
For the Luganda translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
几种重要疫苗在不同人群中的免疫反应存在差异,与高收入和城市环境相比,低收入和农村环境中的反应较低。BCG 免疫接种可增强高收入人群中某些与无关疫苗的免疫反应。我们旨在检验 BCG 再接种是否可以增强乌干达学龄儿童对无关疫苗的反应的假设。
我们进行了一项开放标签、随机对照试验,比较了在乌干达城市出生队列研究中记录了 BCG 接种的 13-17 岁青少年中,BCG 再接种与不进行 BCG 再接种对随后的无关疫苗的免疫原性的影响。如果参与者在 5 岁或以上时已接受了试验疫苗或相关制剂,则将其排除在外。通过 REDCap 实施了 1:1 的计算机生成随机分组。如果参与者同时参加了其他试验;有明显的免疫缺陷史,或严重的精神疾病或中度至重度急性疾病;正在服用免疫抑制剂;对疫苗成分过敏,有形成瘢痕疙瘩的倾向;HIV 检测或妊娠检测呈阳性;是正在哺乳的女性参与者;或计划使用研究药物、疫苗、血液制品或其任何组合,则将其排除在外。被分配到 BCG 再接种组的试验参与者在第 0 周接受了活的皮下 BCG-Russia 疫苗(印度血清研究所,浦那,印度;0.1 mL,右上臂)。所有参与者在第 4 周接受了黄热病疫苗(YF-17D;赛诺菲巴斯德,里昂,法国;0.5 mL,左上臂肌肉内)、口服伤寒疫苗(Ty21a;PaxVax,伦敦,英国;连续三天每天服用一粒胶囊)和四价病毒样颗粒人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗(默克,拉瓦勒,新泽西州,美国;0.5 mL,左上臂肌肉内);并在第 28 周接受了破伤风类毒素-白喉类毒素疫苗(印度血清研究所;0.5 mL,左上臂肌肉内)和 HPV 加强针。对于 14 岁以上尚未接种疫苗的女性参与者,还在第 8 周提供了额外的 HPV 疫苗接种。主要结局是 YF-17D 接种后 4 周黄热病中和抗体滴度、Ty21a 接种后 4 周伤寒沙门氏菌血清型 Typhi(以下简称 S Typhi)O-脂多糖(O:LPS)特异性 IgG 浓度和 HPV 接种后 4 周 HPV-16 和 HPV-18 L1 蛋白特异性 IgG 浓度。主要结局测定在第 8 周进行,在第 52 周进行破伤风类毒素测定。我们采用意向治疗分析比较了试验组之间的对数转换结局,结果回转为几何均数比(GMR)。安全性人群包括所有随机分配的参与者。该试验在 ISRCTN 注册处(ISRCTN8633446)注册,现已完成。
在 2020 年 8 月 31 日至 10 月 12 日期间,我们筛选了 376 名潜在参与者以确定其是否符合纳入标准。我们共招募并随机分配了 300 名参与者至两组(BCG 组 151 人[50%],无 BCG 组 149 人[50%])。300 名参与者中,178 人(59%)为男性,122 人(41%)为女性。BCG 组 151 名参与者中有 142 人(91%)完成了随访,无 BCG 组 149 名参与者中有 139 人(93%)完成了随访。与不进行 BCG 再接种相比,BCG 再接种对任何疫苗的反应均无影响。黄热病微量中和参考检验(PRNT)滴度(最后降低 50%的血浆稀释度的倒数)的 GMR 为 0.95(95%CI 0.75-1.19;p=0.62),PRNT(最后降低 90%的血浆稀释度的倒数)的 GMR 为 0.94(0.74-1.19;p=0.60);伤寒沙门氏菌 O:LPS 的 IgG 为 0.99(0.80-1.23;p=0.94);HPV-16 的 IgG 为 0.97(0.69-1.35;p=0.85),HPV-18 的 IgG 为 1.03(0.76-1.40;p=0.83);破伤风类毒素特异性 IgG 为 1.13(0.87-1.47;p=0.36),白喉类毒素特异性 IgG 为 1.00(0.87-1.16;p=0.97)。两组均无严重不良事件。
我们没有发现 BCG 再接种是提高这种低收入、城市环境中其他疫苗免疫原性的有效策略。
英国医学研究理事会。