Suppr超能文献

在全民医保体系中,移民与非移民的医疗影像学利用比较:基于人群的匹配队列研究。

Medical imaging utilization in migrants compared with nonmigrants in a universal healthcare system: A population-based matched cohort study.

机构信息

Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2024 Oct 22;21(10):e1004474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004474. eCollection 2024 Oct.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medical imaging is an integral part of healthcare. Globalization has resulted in increased mobilization of migrants to new host nations. The association between migration status and utilization of medical imaging is unknown.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

A retrospective population-based matched cohort study was conducted in Ontario, Canada from April 1, 1995 to December 31, 2016. A total of 1,848,222 migrants were matched 1:1 to nonmigrants in the year of migration on age, sex, and geography. Utilization of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), radiography, and ultrasonography was determined. Rate differences per 1,000 person-years comparing migrants to nonmigrants were calculated. Relative rates were calculated using a recurrent event framework, adjusting for age, sex, and time-varying socioeconomic status, comorbidity score, and access to a primary care provider. Estimates were stratified by migration age: children and adolescents (≤19 years), young adults (20 to 39), adults (40 to 59), and older adults (≥60). Utilization rates of CT, MRI, and radiography were lower for migrants across all age groups compared with Ontario nonmigrants. Increasing age at migration was associated with larger differences in utilization rates. Older adult migrants had the largest gap in imaging utilization. The longer the time since migration, the larger the gap in medical imaging use. In multivariable analysis, the relative rate of imaging was approximately 20% to 30% lower for migrants: ranging from 0.77 to 0.88 for CT and 0.72 to 0.80 for MRI imaging across age groups. Radiography relative rates ranged from 0.84 to 0.90. All migrant age groups, except older adults, had higher rates of ultrasonography. The indication for imaging was not captured, thus it was not possible to determine if the imaging was necessary.

CONCLUSIONS

Migrants utilized less CT, MRI, and radiography but more ultrasonography. Older adult migrants used the least amount of imaging compared with nonmigrants. Future research should evaluate whether lower utilization is due to barriers in healthcare access or health-seeking behaviors within a universal healthcare system.

摘要

背景

医学影像学是医疗保健的一个组成部分。全球化导致移民向新的东道国大量迁移。移民身份与医学影像利用之间的关系尚不清楚。

方法和发现

本研究在加拿大安大略省进行了一项回顾性基于人群的匹配队列研究,时间范围为 1995 年 4 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日。共有 1848222 名移民在移民当年按年龄、性别和地理位置与非移民 1:1 匹配。确定了计算机断层扫描(CT)、磁共振成像(MRI)、射线照相术和超声检查的利用率。计算了每 1000 人年移民与非移民之间的率差异。使用复发性事件框架计算相对比率,调整了年龄、性别和随时间变化的社会经济地位、合并症评分以及获得初级保健提供者的情况。根据移民年龄进行分层:儿童和青少年(≤19 岁)、青年(20 至 39 岁)、成年(40 至 59 岁)和老年(≥60 岁)。与安大略省非移民相比,所有年龄组的移民 CT、MRI 和射线照相术的利用率均较低。移民年龄越大,利用率差异越大。老年移民的影像学利用率差距最大。移民时间越长,医学影像学使用差距越大。在多变量分析中,移民的影像学相对比率约低 20%至 30%:儿童和青少年组 CT 为 0.77 至 0.88,MRI 为 0.72 至 0.80;成年组 CT 为 0.77 至 0.88,MRI 为 0.72 至 0.80。射线照相术的相对比率范围为 0.84 至 0.90。除老年组外,所有移民年龄组的超声检查率均较高。影像学的适应证未被捕获,因此无法确定影像学检查是否有必要。

结论

移民 CT、MRI 和射线照相术的利用率较低,但超声检查的利用率较高。与非移民相比,老年移民的影像学检查使用量最少。未来的研究应评估利用率较低是否是由于获得医疗保健的障碍或在全民医疗保健体系中寻求医疗的行为所致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e28/11495850/fd663c54d1bb/pmed.1004474.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验