Suppr超能文献

验证GO-FAR评分:预测中东地区院内心脏骤停的结局

Validating the GO-FAR score: predicting in-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes in the Middle East.

作者信息

Alao David O, Hukan Yaman, Mohammed Nada, Moin Kinza, Sudha Resshme K, Cevik Arif Alper, Abu-Zidan Fikri M

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al-Ain, Ain, United Arab Emirates.

Emergency Department, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.

出版信息

Int J Emerg Med. 2024 Oct 22;17(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12245-024-00749-4.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

External validations of the Good Outcome Following Attempted Resuscitation (GO-FAR) score have been in populations where Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) is practised. We aim to externally validate the GO-FAR score in a population without a DNAR order.

METHODS

We studied patients ≥ 18 years old who had an In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) with known outcomes at Al Ain Hospital from January 2017 to December 2019, excluding those who died in the emergency department. Studied variables included demography, location, response time, code duration, initial rhythm, primary diagnosis, admission vital signs, GO FAR score variables, discharge status, and functional outcomes as determined by the cerebral performance category score ranging from 1 (good cerebral performance) to 5 (brain death).

RESULTS

366 patients were studied; 66.7% were males. The median (IQR) age was 70 (55-81) years. Cardiac and respiratory causes were the primary diagnoses in 89 (24.6%) and 67 (18.5%), respectively. IHCA occurred in critical areas such as the intensive care unit, high dependency unit and coronary care unit in 206 (80.8%) patients. The majority, 308 (91.8%), had a non-shockable rhythm, and a return of spontaneous circulation was achieved in 159 (43.4%) of the patients. Thirty-one (8.5%) patients survived to hospital discharge, and 20 (5.5%) patients had cerebral performance category scores of 1 and 2. The area under the curve of the ROC for survival to discharge with good functional outcome was 0.74 (95% CI 0.59-0.88). The best cut-off point for predicting survival with a good neurological outcome was a GO-FAR score of < 4, having a sensitivity of 0.81, a specificity of 0.7, a positive likelihood ratio of 2.7 and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.27.

CONCLUSIONS

A GO-FAR score of less than 4 predicts survival with a good neurological outcome in a healthcare system with an all-inclusive patient population with no DNAR practice.

摘要

引言与目的

对复苏后良好预后(GO-FAR)评分的外部验证研究对象为实施了不进行心肺复苏(DNAR)的人群。我们旨在对无DNAR医嘱人群中的GO-FAR评分进行外部验证。

方法

我们研究了2017年1月至2019年12月在艾因医院发生院内心脏骤停(IHCA)且结局已知的≥18岁患者,排除在急诊科死亡的患者。研究变量包括人口统计学、发病地点、反应时间、心肺复苏持续时间、初始心律、主要诊断、入院生命体征、GO-FAR评分变量、出院状态以及根据脑功能类别评分确定的功能结局,脑功能类别评分范围为1(脑功能良好)至5(脑死亡)。

结果

共研究了366例患者;66.7%为男性。年龄中位数(四分位间距)为70(55 - 81)岁。心脏和呼吸原因分别是89例(24.6%)和67例(18.5%)的主要诊断。206例(80.8%)患者的IHCA发生在重症监护病房等高危区域。大多数患者,即308例(91.8%),心律不可电击复律,159例(43.4%)患者实现了自主循环恢复。31例(8.5%)患者存活至出院,20例(5.5%)患者的脑功能类别评分为1和2级。出院时功能良好且存活的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.74(95%可信区间0.59 - 0.88)。预测神经功能良好且存活的最佳截断点是GO-FAR评分<4,其灵敏度为0.81,特异度为0.7,阳性似然比为2.7,阴性似然比为0.27。

结论

在没有DNAR措施且涵盖所有患者的医疗系统中,GO-FAR评分小于4可预测神经功能良好且存活。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c650/11494778/5b225967dc59/12245_2024_749_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验