Stewart Georgina Tuari
Te Kura Mātauranga-School of Education, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand.
J R Soc N Z. 2020 Jun 21;52(1):18-24. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2020.1779757. eCollection 2022.
This paper responds to an earlier one about mātauranga Māori by Dan Hikuroa [2017. Mātauranga Māori-the ūkaipō of knowledge in New Zealand. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 47(1):5-10], in a spirit of koha (contribution) towards keeping alive this important discussion about the relationship between science and Māori knowledge. Mātauranga Māori (Māori knowledge) has been discussed for many years in the fields of Education and Māori Studies, and more recently has been taken seriously as a policy issue by the science establishment in Aotearoa New Zealand. I argue against equating mātauranga Māori with science, since I think it is better conceived as a form of philosophy of science, rather than as a form of 'science' itself. This approach possibly allows ideas from mātauranga Māori to inform science at a values level, below the level of the empirical knowledge base, without needing to claim that mātauranga Māori is the same as science or uses scientific methods.
本文是对丹·希库罗阿[2017年。《毛利知识——新西兰知识的源头》。《新西兰皇家学会学报》。47(1):5 - 10]之前一篇关于毛利知识的文章的回应,本着贡献的精神,以延续这场关于科学与毛利知识关系的重要讨论。毛利知识在教育和毛利研究领域已经讨论多年,最近新西兰科学界也将其作为一个政策问题予以重视。我反对将毛利知识等同于科学,因为我认为它更应被视为一种科学哲学形式,而非“科学”本身的一种形式。这种方法可能使毛利知识中的观念在经验知识库层面以下的价值观层面为科学提供信息,而无需宣称毛利知识与科学相同或使用科学方法。