von der Gablentz Janina, Overbeeke Nina, Timmann Dagmar, Ganos Christos, Synofzik Matthis, Brüggemann Norbert, Helmchen Christoph, Sprenger Andreas
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Department of Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences, Essen University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Eur J Neurol. 2025 Jan;32(1):e16520. doi: 10.1111/ene.16520. Epub 2024 Oct 27.
Patients with episodic ataxia type 2 (EA2) suffer from recurrent paroxysmal episodes of vertigo and oscillopsia. Pathophysiologically, altered neuronal excitability has been suspected. Vestibular excitability in 22 EA2 patients and 22 age-matched healthy participants was compared.
Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) was used to assess vestibular excitability by vestibular motion perception thresholds and mean postural sway velocity during various visual and proprioceptive conditions in the two groups. Control stimuli using sham and no GVS were established to identify the specificity of GVS-induced postural sway.
In the baseline condition, EA2 patients showed larger postural instability. However, motion perception thresholds and the increase in mean postural sway velocity during vestibular stimulation (stimulation ratio) did not differ between groups. Postural sway during suprathreshold GVS increased with the vestibular motion perception threshold in EA2 patients, in contrast to healthy participants.
The larger postural unsteadiness of EA2 patients probably reflects their progressive cerebellar degeneration. It is not related to abnormal visual (Romberg's ratio) or proprioceptive control of stance. Postural unsteadiness during vestibular stimulation does not indicate altered vestibular excitability in EA2 patients. However, vestibular stimulation increasingly destabilized postural control of EA2 patients with higher motion perception thresholds when proprioceptive information was diminished. This conclusion, however, is restricted to the postural control of EA2 patients in the interval between the vestibulo-cerebellar episodes.
发作性共济失调2型(EA2)患者会反复出现眩晕和视振荡的阵发性发作。在病理生理学上,怀疑存在神经元兴奋性改变。比较了22例EA2患者和22名年龄匹配的健康参与者的前庭兴奋性。
采用直流电前庭刺激(GVS),通过两组在各种视觉和本体感觉条件下的前庭运动感知阈值和平均姿势摇摆速度来评估前庭兴奋性。使用假刺激和无GVS的对照刺激来确定GVS诱发姿势摇摆的特异性。
在基线条件下,EA2患者表现出更大的姿势不稳定性。然而,两组之间的运动感知阈值和前庭刺激期间平均姿势摇摆速度的增加(刺激比率)并无差异。与健康参与者相比,EA2患者在阈上GVS期间的姿势摇摆随着前庭运动感知阈值的增加而增加。
EA2患者更大的姿势不稳定可能反映了他们进行性的小脑变性。这与异常的视觉(罗姆伯格比率)或姿势的本体感觉控制无关。前庭刺激期间的姿势不稳定并不表明EA2患者的前庭兴奋性改变。然而,当前庭本体感觉信息减少时,前庭刺激会使运动感知阈值较高的EA2患者的姿势控制越来越不稳定。然而,这一结论仅限于EA2患者在前庭小脑发作间期的姿势控制。