Suppr超能文献

中心静脉置管。三种经皮穿刺方法的失败率和并发症发生率

Central vein catheterization. Failure and complication rates by three percutaneous approaches.

作者信息

Sznajder J I, Zveibil F R, Bitterman H, Weiner P, Bursztein S

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 1986 Feb;146(2):259-61. doi: 10.1001/archinte.146.2.259.

Abstract

We prospectively studied the results of 714 attempts at central venous catheterization during an eight-month period in our intensive care department. We compared the rates of failure of catheterization and early complications among three percutaneous approaches: subclavian, anterior jugular, and posterior jugular veins. The procedures were performed by experienced staff or resident physicians and inexperienced interns and residents under teaching supervision. Overall rates of failure and complication were similar for each percutaneous approach within each group of physicians. Overall failure rate was 10.1% for the experienced group and 19.4% for the inexperienced. The complication was 5.4% for experienced and 11% for inexperienced. Among inexperienced physicians, the success rate was 86.7% and the complication rate 7.6% in unconscious patients, whereas in conscious patients these rates were 70.5% and 13.8%, respectively. The inexperienced physicians caused fewer complications in mechanically ventilated than in spontaneously breathing patients. We suggest that inexperienced physicians should first attempt central vein catheterizations in unconscious and mechanically ventilated patients.

摘要

我们对重症监护病房8个月期间714次中心静脉置管尝试的结果进行了前瞻性研究。我们比较了三种经皮穿刺途径(锁骨下静脉、颈前静脉和颈后静脉)的置管失败率和早期并发症发生率。这些操作由经验丰富的工作人员或住院医师以及在教学监督下的经验不足的实习医生和住院医师进行。在每组医生中,每种经皮穿刺途径的总体失败率和并发症发生率相似。经验丰富组的总体失败率为10.1%,经验不足组为19.4%。经验丰富组的并发症发生率为5.4%,经验不足组为11%。在经验不足的医生中,无意识患者的成功率为86.7%,并发症发生率为7.6%,而有意识患者的这些比率分别为70.5%和13.8%。经验不足的医生在机械通气患者中引起的并发症比在自主呼吸患者中少。我们建议经验不足的医生应首先尝试对无意识和机械通气患者进行中心静脉置管。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验