Braam Dorien Hanneke, Bolajoko Muhammad-Bashir, Hammer Charlotte C
Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, United Kingdom.
National Veterinary Research Institute, Vom, Nigeria.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Oct 31;4(10):e0003637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003637. eCollection 2024.
In Plateau State, pastoralism has historically been a cost effective and resilient economic system well-suited to the ecological context. However, changes in land use and conflict have increasingly changed patterns of mobility. Pastoralist movement is now often associated with zoonotic disease transmission, environmental degradation and conflict, increasingly resulting in forced sedentarisation. Rather than a direct outcome of population movement however, animal, human and zoonotic disease drivers are complex and influenced by a range of socio-economic and environmental factors. The interlinkages of (im)mobility and health requires better understanding of underlying vulnerabilities to disease, which we aim to address in this study. Using a multisite case study methodology we investigated pastoralists' animal and human health concerns and priorities in Plateau State, Nigeria. We deployed participatory tools, including open-ended Focus Group Discussions, transect walks, mapping exercises, calendars and matrices. Data were analysed using a One Health conceptual framework. We interviewed 105 participants, from transhumance, migratory and sedentary households, dependent on livestock and small-scale crops. While transhumance was often preferred, participants had become sedentary as a result of insecurity, loss in livestock, and household characteristics. Humans and animals suffered from several endemic diseases, including zoonoses, however veterinary and human health services are only available in larger towns, and people mostly rely on community (animal) health workers and self-medication. Both transhumance and sedentary livestock keepers face challenges around forage grazing, regularly blocked by landowners, sometimes escalating into conflict. While conflict and changes in land use affected animal and human disease patterns, underlying political, social and economic risk factors were important determinants of health. There is a need for more inclusive, transdisciplinary, multilevel approaches to address animal and human disease, based on better contextualization of the challenges, through the participation of affected communities.
在高原州,从历史上看,游牧业一直是一种成本效益高且具有韧性的经济体系,非常适合当地的生态环境。然而,土地利用的变化和冲突日益改变了流动模式。如今,牧民的迁徙往往与人畜共患病传播、环境退化和冲突相关联,越来越多地导致被迫定居。然而,动物、人类和人畜共患病的驱动因素并非人口流动的直接结果,而是复杂的,受到一系列社会经济和环境因素的影响。流动与健康之间的相互联系需要更好地理解疾病的潜在脆弱性,我们旨在本研究中解决这一问题。我们采用多地点案例研究方法,调查了尼日利亚高原州牧民对动物和人类健康的关注及优先事项。我们运用了参与式工具,包括开放式焦点小组讨论、样带走访、绘图活动、日历和矩阵。数据使用“同一健康”概念框架进行分析。我们采访了105名参与者,他们来自依赖牲畜和小规模作物的季节性迁移、迁徙和定居家庭。虽然季节性迁移通常更受青睐,但由于不安全、牲畜损失和家庭特征等原因,参与者已转为定居。人类和动物都患有多种地方病,包括人畜共患病,然而兽医和人类健康服务仅在较大的城镇才有,人们大多依赖社区(动物)卫生工作者和自我用药。季节性迁移和定居的牲畜饲养者在草料放牧方面都面临挑战,经常被土地所有者阻拦,有时甚至升级为冲突。虽然冲突和土地利用变化影响了动物和人类的疾病模式,但潜在的政治、社会和经济风险因素是健康的重要决定因素。需要采取更具包容性、跨学科、多层次方法来应对动物和人类疾病,这基于通过受影响社区的参与更好地将挑战情境化。