Gosselink I F, van Schooten F J, Drittij M J, Höppener E M, Leonhardt P, Moschini E, Serchi T, Gutleb A C, Kooter I M, Remels A H
Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, TNO, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Chemosphere. 2024 Nov;368:143702. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143702. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
Inhalation is one of the main exposure routes to nanoplastics. Knowledge of the toxicological impact of nanoplastics on the airway- and lung epithelium is limited and almost exclusively based on submerged in vitro models using spherical polystyrene (PS) particles.
Mono-cultures and advanced (co-)cultures of human bronchial- and alveolar epithelial cells, all air-liquid interface (ALI) cultures, were exposed to nanoplastics and reference nanoparticles. Alveolar models included A549 mono-cultures and A549 cells co-cultured with endothelial cells (Ea.hy926) and macrophage-like cells (differentiated THP-1). Bronchial models included BEAS-2B cells and differentiated primary bronchial epithelial cells (PBEC). Cultures were exposed to PS, copper(II) oxide (CuO) or titanium dioxide (TiO) nanoparticles (50 nm). Additionally, BEAS-2B cells were exposed to well-characterised, amorphous polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polypropylene (PP), or polyamide (PA) nanoplastics. Cytotoxicity and inflammation (IL-8 secretion and IL-8 transcript levels) were assessed after 24 h of exposure.
Cell viability remained unaffected by all exposures in all models. Unlike PS and TiO, CuO exposure dose-dependently induced IL-8 protein secretion and mRNA levels. Although the extent of IL-8 secretion differed between models, the relative response to CuO was similar in both mono-cultures and advanced (co-)cultures. None of the environmentally relevant nanoplastics (PVC, PA or PP) impacted inflammation or cell viability in BEAS-2B ALI cultures.
Although CuO induced inflammation, PS failed to elicit an inflammatory response in any of our models. For the first time, we show that PVC, PA and PP do not induce cell death or inflammation in a BEAS-2B ALI model.
吸入是纳米塑料的主要暴露途径之一。纳米塑料对气道和肺上皮细胞的毒理学影响的相关知识有限,且几乎完全基于使用球形聚苯乙烯(PS)颗粒的浸没式体外模型。
将人支气管和肺泡上皮细胞的单培养物以及先进的(共)培养物(均为气液界面(ALI)培养物)暴露于纳米塑料和参考纳米颗粒。肺泡模型包括A549单培养物以及与内皮细胞(Ea.hy926)和巨噬细胞样细胞(分化后的THP-1)共培养的A549细胞。支气管模型包括BEAS-2B细胞和分化的原代支气管上皮细胞(PBEC)。将培养物暴露于PS、氧化铜(CuO)或二氧化钛(TiO)纳米颗粒(50纳米)。此外,将BEAS-2B细胞暴露于特性明确的无定形聚氯乙烯(PVC)、聚丙烯(PP)或聚酰胺(PA)纳米塑料。暴露24小时后评估细胞毒性和炎症反应(白细胞介素-8分泌和白细胞介素-8转录水平)。
在所有模型中,所有暴露均未影响细胞活力。与PS和TiO不同,CuO暴露呈剂量依赖性地诱导白细胞介素-8蛋白分泌和mRNA水平。尽管不同模型中白细胞介素-8的分泌程度有所不同,但单培养物和先进的(共)培养物对CuO的相对反应相似。在BEAS-2B ALI培养物中,任何一种与环境相关的纳米塑料(PVC、PA或PP)均未影响炎症反应或细胞活力。
尽管CuO会引发炎症,但在我们的任何模型中PS均未引发炎症反应。我们首次表明,在BEAS-2B ALI模型中,PVC、PA和PP不会诱导细胞死亡或炎症。