• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腺嘌呤碱基编辑器在小鼠胚胎和原代人 T 细胞中诱导脱靶结构变异。

Adenine base editors induce off-target structure variations in mouse embryos and primary human T cells.

机构信息

Institute of Neuroscience, CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.

Epigenic Therapeutics, Inc, Shanghai, 201315, China.

出版信息

Genome Biol. 2024 Nov 11;25(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s13059-024-03434-0.

DOI:10.1186/s13059-024-03434-0
PMID:39529170
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11552398/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The safety of CRISPR-based gene editing methods is of the utmost priority in clinical applications. Previous studies have reported that Cas9 cleavage induced frequent aneuploidy in primary human T cells, but whether cleavage-mediated editing of base editors would generate off-target structure variations remains unknown. Here, we investigate the potential off-target structural variations associated with CRISPR/Cas9, ABE, and CBE editing in mouse embryos and primary human T cells by whole-genome sequencing and single-cell RNA-seq analyses.

RESULTS

The results show that both Cas9 and ABE generate off-target structural variations (SVs) in mouse embryos, while CBE induces rare SVs. In addition, off-target large deletions are detected in 32.74% of primary human T cells transfected with Cas9 and 9.17% of cells transfected with ABE. Moreover, Cas9-induced aneuploid cells activate the P53 and apoptosis pathways, whereas ABE-associated aneuploid cells significantly upregulate cell cycle-related genes and are arrested in the G0 phase. A percentage of 16.59% and 4.29% aneuploid cells are still observable at 3 weeks post transfection of Cas9 or ABE. These off-target phenomena in ABE are universal as observed in other cell types such as B cells and Huh7. Furthermore, the off-target SVs are significantly reduced in cells treated with high-fidelity ABE (ABE-V106W).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows both CRISPR/Cas9 and ABE induce off-target SVs in mouse embryos and primary human T cells, raising an urgent need for the development of high-fidelity gene editing tools.

摘要

背景

CRISPR 为基础的基因编辑方法的安全性在临床应用中至关重要。先前的研究报告称,Cas9 切割在原代人 T 细胞中诱导频繁的非整倍体,但 Cas9 介导的碱基编辑器的编辑是否会产生脱靶结构变异尚不清楚。在这里,我们通过全基因组测序和单细胞 RNA-seq 分析研究了 CRISPR/Cas9、ABE 和 CBE 编辑在小鼠胚胎和原代人 T 细胞中与潜在的脱靶结构变异相关的情况。

结果

结果表明,Cas9 和 ABE 都在小鼠胚胎中产生脱靶结构变异(SVs),而 CBE 诱导罕见的 SVs。此外,在转染 Cas9 的 32.74%的原代人 T 细胞和转染 ABE 的 9.17%的细胞中检测到脱靶大片段缺失。此外,Cas9 诱导的非整倍体细胞激活了 P53 和凋亡途径,而 ABE 相关的非整倍体细胞显著上调了细胞周期相关基因,并在 G0 期停滞。在转染 Cas9 或 ABE 3 周后,仍可观察到 16.59%和 4.29%的非整倍体细胞。ABE 中的这些脱靶现象是普遍存在的,在 B 细胞和 Huh7 等其他细胞类型中也观察到了这种现象。此外,在高保真 ABE(ABE-V106W)处理的细胞中,脱靶 SVs 显著减少。

结论

本研究表明,CRISPR/Cas9 和 ABE 都会在小鼠胚胎和原代人 T 细胞中诱导脱靶 SVs,这就迫切需要开发高保真的基因编辑工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07c0/11552398/88bc6136b2a6/13059_2024_3434_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07c0/11552398/5bf375b7d7b8/13059_2024_3434_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07c0/11552398/ef785066f08f/13059_2024_3434_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07c0/11552398/edc3d03395c0/13059_2024_3434_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07c0/11552398/4308faf74ec2/13059_2024_3434_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07c0/11552398/88bc6136b2a6/13059_2024_3434_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07c0/11552398/5bf375b7d7b8/13059_2024_3434_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07c0/11552398/ef785066f08f/13059_2024_3434_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07c0/11552398/edc3d03395c0/13059_2024_3434_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07c0/11552398/4308faf74ec2/13059_2024_3434_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07c0/11552398/88bc6136b2a6/13059_2024_3434_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Adenine base editors induce off-target structure variations in mouse embryos and primary human T cells.腺嘌呤碱基编辑器在小鼠胚胎和原代人 T 细胞中诱导脱靶结构变异。
Genome Biol. 2024 Nov 11;25(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s13059-024-03434-0.
2
Targeting fidelity of adenine and cytosine base editors in mouse embryos.靶向腺嘌呤和胞嘧啶碱基编辑器在小鼠胚胎中的保真度。
Nat Commun. 2018 Nov 15;9(1):4804. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07322-7.
3
Cytosine base editor 4 but not adenine base editor generates off-target mutations in mouse embryos.胞嘧啶碱基编辑器 4 而非腺嘌呤碱基编辑器会在小鼠胚胎中产生脱靶突变。
Commun Biol. 2020 Jan 9;3(1):19. doi: 10.1038/s42003-019-0745-3.
4
Adenine base-editing-mediated exon skipping induces gene knockout in cultured pig cells.腺嘌呤碱基编辑介导的外显子跳跃在培养的猪细胞中诱导基因敲除。
Biotechnol Lett. 2022 Jan;44(1):59-76. doi: 10.1007/s10529-021-03214-x. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
5
Heterologous Expression and Purification of a CRISPR-Cas9-Based Adenine Base Editor.基于 CRISPR-Cas9 的腺嘌呤碱基编辑器的异源表达和纯化。
Methods Mol Biol. 2023;2606:123-133. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2879-9_10.
6
Engineering domain-inlaid SaCas9 adenine base editors with reduced RNA off-targets and increased on-target DNA editing.工程域镶嵌 SaCas9 腺嘌呤碱基编辑器,降低 RNA 脱靶率,提高靶向 DNA 编辑效率。
Nat Commun. 2020 Sep 25;11(1):4871. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18715-y.
7
BEAR reveals that increased fidelity variants can successfully reduce the mismatch tolerance of adenine but not cytosine base editors.BEAR 揭示,提高保真度的变体可以成功降低腺嘌呤碱基编辑器的错配容忍度,但不能降低胞嘧啶碱基编辑器的错配容忍度。
Nat Commun. 2021 Nov 3;12(1):6353. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26461-y.
8
CRISPR-Based Adenine Editors Correct Nonsense Mutations in a Cystic Fibrosis Organoid Biobank.基于 CRISPR 的腺嘌呤编辑器纠正囊性纤维化类器官生物库中的无义突变。
Cell Stem Cell. 2020 Apr 2;26(4):503-510.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.01.019. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
9
High-purity production and precise editing of DNA base editing ribonucleoproteins.高纯度生产和精确编辑 DNA 碱基编辑核糖核蛋白。
Sci Adv. 2021 Aug 27;7(35). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abg2661. Print 2021 Aug.
10
Frequency and mechanisms of LINE-1 retrotransposon insertions at CRISPR/Cas9 sites.LINE-1 反转录转座子在 CRISPR/Cas9 位点的插入频率和机制。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jun 27;13(1):3685. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31322-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Recent advances in universal chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy.通用嵌合抗原受体T细胞疗法的最新进展
J Hematol Oncol. 2025 Aug 29;18(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s13045-025-01737-8.
2
A Singular Base Editing Platform for Polyfunctional Multiplex Engineering of Immune Cells.一种用于免疫细胞多功能多重工程的独特碱基编辑平台。
bioRxiv. 2025 Jul 16:2025.07.11.664404. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.11.664404.
3
Quadruple adenine base-edited allogeneic CAR T cells outperform CRISPR/Cas9 nuclease-engineered T cells.四重腺嘌呤碱基编辑的同种异体嵌合抗原受体T细胞优于CRISPR/Cas9核酸酶工程改造的T细胞。

本文引用的文献

1
C-to-G editing generates double-strand breaks causing deletion, transversion and translocation.C 到 G 碱基编辑会产生双链断裂,导致缺失、颠换和易位。
Nat Cell Biol. 2024 Feb;26(2):294-304. doi: 10.1038/s41556-023-01342-2. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
2
Engineering of cytosine base editors with DNA damage minimization and editing scope diversification.工程化胞嘧啶碱基编辑器以最小化 DNA 损伤和多样化编辑范围。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2023 Nov 10;51(20):e105. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad855.
3
Mitigation of chromosome loss in clinical CRISPR-Cas9-engineered T cells.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 May 20;122(20):e2427216122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2427216122. Epub 2025 May 5.
临床 CRISPR-Cas9 基因编辑 T 细胞中染色体丢失的减轻。
Cell. 2023 Oct 12;186(21):4567-4582.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.041. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
4
Prediction of base editor off-targets by deep learning.深度学习预测碱基编辑器脱靶。
Nat Commun. 2023 Sep 2;14(1):5358. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41004-3.
5
Structural basis for Cas9 off-target activity.Cas9 脱靶活性的结构基础。
Cell. 2022 Oct 27;185(22):4067-4081.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.09.026.
6
Non-viral, specifically targeted CAR-T cells achieve high safety and efficacy in B-NHL.非病毒、特异性靶向 CAR-T 细胞在 B-NHL 中具有高安全性和疗效。
Nature. 2022 Sep;609(7926):369-374. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05140-y. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
7
Frequent aneuploidy in primary human T cells after CRISPR-Cas9 cleavage.CRISPR-Cas9 切割后原发性人 T 细胞中频繁的非整倍体。
Nat Biotechnol. 2022 Dec;40(12):1807-1813. doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01377-0. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
8
Cas9-induced large deletions and small indels are controlled in a convergent fashion.Cas9 诱导的大片段缺失和小片段插入以收敛的方式被控制。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jun 14;13(1):3422. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30480-8.
9
High Expression of CKS2 Predicts Adverse Outcomes: A Potential Therapeutic Target for Glioma.CKS2 高表达预示不良结局:胶质瘤潜在的治疗靶点。
Front Immunol. 2022 May 19;13:881453. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.881453. eCollection 2022.
10
PEM-seq comprehensively quantifies DNA repair outcomes during gene-editing and DSB repair.PEM-seq 全面定量分析了基因编辑和 DSB 修复过程中的 DNA 修复结果。
STAR Protoc. 2022 Jan 17;3(1):101088. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.101088. eCollection 2022 Mar 18.