Rudolf Robert
College of International Studies, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 28;15:1446301. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1446301. eCollection 2024.
Using rich data from nearly 400,000 15-year-olds across 70 middle- and high-income countries and economies participating in PISA 2018, this study investigates (1) global predictors of adolescent subjective well-being (SWB), and (2) differences in adolescent life satisfaction, its predictors and endowments with predictors across world regions and cultures. A particular focus lies on comparing Confucian East Asia (CEA) with other world regions.
Data were analyzed using multiple linear regressions and Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition. As measures of adolescent well-being, this study employs life satisfaction, affective well-being, and meaning in life.
Globally, adolescent well-being outcomes are found to be most strongly linked to gender, personality, relative SES, relationship quality, peer SWB, autonomy and the learning environment, as well as local cultural factors. Estimations by world region reveal several culture-specific explanations for interregional well-being gaps. In particular, notoriously low levels of life satisfaction among students from CEA countries are found to be associated with low self-efficacy, low peer well-being, as well as with high emotional interdependence compared to other world regions. Emotional interdependence is more strongly experienced among CEA adolescents compared to adolescents from any other world region. Moreover, it is found to be more strongly associated with life satisfaction in the CEA region than in any other region. In line with the former, CEA students show stronger links between other relational factors (parents' emotional support; sense of belonging at school) and life satisfaction compared to most other regions.
This study suggests that among the environmental factors that shape the experience of adolescent lives, relationship and cultural factors play key roles and are closely intertwined. Parents, educators and policymakers around the world should focus on creating a positive school environment that promotes well-being, student self-efficacy, a sense of belonging, and a safe space in which failure is accepted as part of the learning process. This is particularly needed in Confucian East Asian countries.
本研究利用来自参与2018年国际学生评估项目(PISA)的70个中高收入国家和经济体的近40万名15岁青少年的丰富数据,调查(1)青少年主观幸福感(SWB)的全球预测因素,以及(2)青少年生活满意度、其预测因素以及全球各地区和文化中预测因素的禀赋差异。特别关注儒家东亚地区(CEA)与世界其他地区的比较。
使用多元线性回归和布林德-奥萨克分解法对数据进行分析。本研究采用生活满意度、情感幸福感和生活意义作为青少年幸福感的衡量指标。
在全球范围内,青少年的幸福感结果与性别、个性、相对社会经济地位、人际关系质量、同伴主观幸福感、自主性和学习环境以及当地文化因素最为密切相关。按世界区域进行的估计揭示了区域间幸福感差距的几种特定文化解释。特别是,儒家东亚国家学生的生活满意度极低,这与自我效能感低、同伴幸福感低以及与世界其他地区相比情感相互依赖程度高有关。与世界其他任何地区的青少年相比,儒家东亚地区的青少年更强烈地体验到情感相互依赖。此外,与其他任何地区相比,情感相互依赖在儒家东亚地区与生活满意度的关联更强。与前者一致,与大多数其他地区相比,儒家东亚地区的学生在其他关系因素(父母的情感支持;在学校的归属感)与生活满意度之间表现出更强的联系。
本研究表明,在塑造青少年生活体验的环境因素中,关系和文化因素起着关键作用,并且紧密相连。世界各地的家长、教育工作者和政策制定者应专注于营造一个促进幸福感、学生自我效能感、归属感以及一个接受失败作为学习过程一部分的安全空间的积极学校环境。儒家东亚国家尤其需要这样做。