• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

流行病学中的因果推理中的机器学习。

Machine learning in causal inference for epidemiology.

机构信息

Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin and CPO Piedmont, Via Santena 7, Turin, 10126, Italy.

Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Epidemiol. 2024 Oct;39(10):1097-1108. doi: 10.1007/s10654-024-01173-x. Epub 2024 Nov 13.

DOI:10.1007/s10654-024-01173-x
PMID:39535572
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11599438/
Abstract

In causal inference, parametric models are usually employed to address causal questions estimating the effect of interest. However, parametric models rely on the correct model specification assumption that, if not met, leads to biased effect estimates. Correct model specification is challenging, especially in high-dimensional settings. Incorporating Machine Learning (ML) into causal analyses may reduce the bias arising from model misspecification, since ML methods do not require the specification of a functional form of the relationship between variables. However, when ML predictions are directly plugged in a predefined formula of the effect of interest, there is the risk of introducing a "plug-in bias" in the effect measure. To overcome this problem and to achieve useful asymptotic properties, new estimators that combine the predictive potential of ML and the ability of traditional statistical methods to make inference about population parameters have been proposed. For epidemiologists interested in taking advantage of ML for causal inference investigations, we provide an overview of three estimators that represent the current state-of-art, namely Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation (TMLE), Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW) and Double/Debiased Machine Learning (DML).

摘要

在因果推断中,通常采用参数模型来解决因果问题,估计感兴趣的效应。然而,参数模型依赖于正确的模型规格假设,如果不满足,会导致有偏的效应估计。正确的模型规格是具有挑战性的,特别是在高维环境中。将机器学习(ML)纳入因果分析中,可以减少因模型不规范而产生的偏差,因为 ML 方法不需要指定变量之间关系的函数形式。然而,当 ML 预测值直接插入到感兴趣的效应的预定义公式中时,可能会在效应量测中引入“插件偏差”。为了克服这个问题并实现有用的渐近性质,已经提出了新的估计量,它们结合了 ML 的预测潜力和传统统计方法对总体参数进行推断的能力。对于有兴趣利用 ML 进行因果推断研究的流行病学家,我们提供了三种当前最先进的估计量的概述,即靶向最大似然估计(TMLE)、增强逆概率加权(AIPW)和双重/去偏机器学习(DML)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5837/11599438/23c8910eb88b/10654_2024_1173_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5837/11599438/23c8910eb88b/10654_2024_1173_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5837/11599438/23c8910eb88b/10654_2024_1173_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine learning in causal inference for epidemiology.流行病学中的因果推理中的机器学习。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2024 Oct;39(10):1097-1108. doi: 10.1007/s10654-024-01173-x. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
2
Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Causal Inference in Observational Studies.观察性研究中因果推断的靶向最大似然估计
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Jan 1;185(1):65-73. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww165. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
3
Machine Learning for Causal Inference: On the Use of Cross-fit Estimators.机器学习在因果推断中的应用:基于交叉拟合估计量的研究。
Epidemiology. 2021 May 1;32(3):393-401. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001332.
4
AIPW: An R Package for Augmented Inverse Probability-Weighted Estimation of Average Causal Effects.AIPW:用于平均因果效应的增强逆概率加权估计的 R 包。
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Dec 1;190(12):2690-2699. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab207.
5
Thirteen Questions About Using Machine Learning in Causal Research (You Won't Believe the Answer to Number 10!).使用机器学习进行因果研究的十三个问题(你不会相信问题 10 的答案!)!
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Aug 1;190(8):1476-1482. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab047.
6
Machine learning in the estimation of causal effects: targeted minimum loss-based estimation and double/debiased machine learning.机器学习在因果效应估计中的应用:基于有向最小损失的估计和双重/无偏机器学习。
Biostatistics. 2020 Apr 1;21(2):353-358. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxz042.
7
Targeted maximum likelihood estimation for a binary treatment: A tutorial.针对二项治疗的目标极大似然估计:教程。
Stat Med. 2018 Jul 20;37(16):2530-2546. doi: 10.1002/sim.7628. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
8
Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.协作双稳健靶向最大似然估计
Int J Biostat. 2010 May 17;6(1):Article 17. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1181.
9
Effect Estimation in Point-Exposure Studies with Binary Outcomes and High-Dimensional Covariate Data - A Comparison of Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting.二元结局和高维协变量数据的点暴露研究中的效应估计——靶向最大似然估计与治疗权重逆概率的比较
Int J Biostat. 2016 Nov 1;12(2). doi: 10.1515/ijb-2015-0034.
10
Guidelines and Best Practices for the Use of Targeted Maximum Likelihood and Machine Learning When Estimating Causal Effects of Exposures on Time-To-Event Outcomes.估计暴露因素对事件发生时间结局的因果效应时使用靶向最大似然法和机器学习的指南与最佳实践
Stat Med. 2025 Mar 15;44(6):e70034. doi: 10.1002/sim.70034.

引用本文的文献

1
Complex methods for complex data: key considerations for interpretable and actionable results in exposome research.复杂数据的复杂方法:暴露组研究中可解释且可操作结果的关键考量因素
Eur J Epidemiol. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s10654-025-01281-2.
2
Understanding the causal effects and heterogeneity between metabolic syndrome and lung function: a nationwide prospective cohort study in China.了解代谢综合征与肺功能之间的因果关系及异质性:一项中国全国性前瞻性队列研究。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2025 Jul 2;17(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s13098-025-01821-6.
3
Investigating causal networks of dementia using causal discovery and natural language processing models.

本文引用的文献

1
Defining and Identifying Average Treatment Effects.定义和识别平均治疗效果。
Am J Epidemiol. 2023 May 5;192(5):685-687. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwad012.
2
Comparing the effectiveness of a brief intervention to reduce unhealthy alcohol use among adult primary care patients with and without depression: A machine learning approach with augmented inverse probability weighting.比较针对有和无抑郁的成年初级保健患者减少不健康饮酒的简短干预措施的效果:基于增强逆概率加权的机器学习方法。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022 Oct 1;239:109607. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109607. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
3
State-of-the-art methods for exposure-health studies: Results from the exposome data challenge event.
使用因果发现和自然语言处理模型研究痴呆症的因果网络。
NPJ Dement. 2025;1(1):4. doi: 10.1038/s44400-025-00006-2. Epub 2025 May 9.
4
Do we need flexible machine-learning algorithms to assess the effect of long-term exposure to fine particulate matter on mortality?: An example from a Canadian national cohort.我们是否需要灵活的机器学习算法来评估长期暴露于细颗粒物对死亡率的影响?:来自加拿大全国队列的一个例子。
Environ Epidemiol. 2025 Mar 4;9(2):e375. doi: 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000375. eCollection 2025 Apr.
5
Diabetes Prediction Through Linkage of Causal Discovery and Inference Model with Machine Learning Models.通过因果发现与推理模型和机器学习模型的联动进行糖尿病预测
Biomedicines. 2025 Jan 7;13(1):124. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13010124.
6
What Epidemiologists Can Do in the Era of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence.流行病学家在机器学习和人工智能时代能做什么。
J Epidemiol. 2025 Jun 5;35(6):303-304. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20240412. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
暴露组学研究的最新方法:来自暴露组数据挑战事件的结果。
Environ Int. 2022 Oct;168:107422. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107422. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
4
Machine learning in clinical decision making.机器学习在临床决策中的应用。
Med. 2021 Jun 11;2(6):642-665. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2021.04.006. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
5
The impact of obesity on outcomes of patients admitted to intensive care after cardiac arrest.肥胖对心脏骤停后入住重症监护病房患者预后的影响。
J Crit Care. 2022 Jun;69:154025. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154025. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
6
Association between kidney function and intracerebral hematoma volume.肾功能与脑内血肿量的关系。
J Clin Neurosci. 2022 Feb;96:101-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.12.022. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
7
Impact of laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing resection of lesions in the right posterosuperior liver segments on surgical outcomes: A multicenter study based on propensity score analysis.腹腔镜保留实质的右肝后上段病变切除术对手术结果的影响:一项基于倾向评分分析的多中心研究。
Surgery. 2022 May;171(5):1311-1319. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.09.021. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
8
Introduction to computational causal inference using reproducible Stata, R, and Python code: A tutorial.使用可重现的Stata、R和Python代码进行计算因果推断入门教程
Stat Med. 2022 Jan 30;41(2):407-432. doi: 10.1002/sim.9234. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
9
AIPW: An R Package for Augmented Inverse Probability-Weighted Estimation of Average Causal Effects.AIPW:用于平均因果效应的增强逆概率加权估计的 R 包。
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Dec 1;190(12):2690-2699. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab207.
10
Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting and the Double Robustness Property.增强逆概率加权法与双重稳健性特性。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Feb;42(2):156-167. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211027181. Epub 2021 Jul 6.