School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Center for Self-Report Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 13;8:e54335. doi: 10.2196/54335.
The underdiagnosis of cognitive impairment hinders timely intervention of dementia. Health professionals working in the community play a critical role in the early detection of cognitive impairment, yet still face several challenges such as a lack of suitable tools, necessary training, and potential stigmatization.
This study explored a novel application integrating psychometric methods with data science techniques to model subtle inconsistencies in questionnaire response data for early identification of cognitive impairment in community environments.
This study analyzed questionnaire response data from participants aged 50 years and older in the Health and Retirement Study (waves 8-9, n=12,942). Predictors included low-quality response indices generated using the graded response model from four brief questionnaires (optimism, hopelessness, purpose in life, and life satisfaction) assessing aspects of overall well-being, a focus of health professionals in communities. The primary and supplemental predicted outcomes were current cognitive impairment derived from a validated criterion and dementia or mortality in the next ten years. Seven predictive models were trained, and the performance of these models was evaluated and compared.
The multilayer perceptron exhibited the best performance in predicting current cognitive impairment. In the selected four questionnaires, the area under curve values for identifying current cognitive impairment ranged from 0.63 to 0.66 and was improved to 0.71 to 0.74 when combining the low-quality response indices with age and gender for prediction. We set the threshold for assessing cognitive impairment risk in the tool based on the ratio of underdiagnosis costs to overdiagnosis costs, and a ratio of 4 was used as the default choice. Furthermore, the tool outperformed the efficiency of age or health-based screening strategies for identifying individuals at high risk for cognitive impairment, particularly in the 50- to 59-year and 60- to 69-year age groups. The tool is available on a portal website for the public to access freely.
We developed a novel prediction tool that integrates psychometric methods with data science to facilitate "passive or backend" cognitive impairment assessments in community settings, aiming to promote early cognitive impairment detection. This tool simplifies the cognitive impairment assessment process, making it more adaptable and reducing burdens. Our approach also presents a new perspective for using questionnaire data: leveraging, rather than dismissing, low-quality data.
认知障碍的漏诊阻碍了痴呆症的及时干预。在社区工作的卫生专业人员在认知障碍的早期检测中发挥着关键作用,但仍面临着一些挑战,例如缺乏合适的工具、必要的培训以及潜在的污名化。
本研究探索了一种新的应用,将心理计量学方法与数据科学技术相结合,为社区环境中认知障碍的早期识别建立模型,以模拟问卷回答数据中的细微不一致。
本研究分析了来自参加健康与退休研究(第 8-9 波,n=12942)的 50 岁及以上参与者的问卷回答数据。预测因子包括使用四个简短问卷(乐观、绝望、生活目标和生活满意度)中的分级反应模型生成的低质量反应指数,这些问卷评估了社区卫生专业人员关注的整体幸福感的各个方面。主要和补充预测结果是来自经过验证的标准的当前认知障碍和未来十年内的痴呆症或死亡率。训练了七个预测模型,并评估和比较了这些模型的性能。
多层感知机在预测当前认知障碍方面表现最佳。在所选择的四个问卷中,用于识别当前认知障碍的曲线下面积值范围为 0.63 至 0.66,当将低质量反应指数与年龄和性别结合用于预测时,该值提高至 0.71 至 0.74。我们根据漏诊成本与过度诊断成本的比值设定了工具中评估认知障碍风险的阈值,并选择 4 作为默认比值。此外,该工具在识别认知障碍风险较高的个体方面优于年龄或基于健康的筛查策略,尤其是在 50 至 59 岁和 60 至 69 岁年龄组。该工具可在一个门户网站上供公众免费访问。
我们开发了一种新的预测工具,将心理计量学方法与数据科学相结合,以促进社区环境中的“被动或后端”认知障碍评估,旨在促进早期认知障碍的检测。该工具简化了认知障碍评估过程,使其更具适应性并减轻了负担。我们的方法还为使用问卷数据提供了一个新视角:利用而不是忽略低质量数据。