London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
Institute for Global Health and Development and ReBUILD for Resilience Consortium, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Nov 13;8(Suppl 5):e015771. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015771.
The private sector plays a substantial role in delivering and financing healthcare in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Supporting governments to govern the private sector effectively, and so improve outcomes across the health system, requires an understanding of the evidence base on private health sector governance. This paper reports on a scoping review, which synthesised evidence on the approaches used to govern private sector delivery and financing of healthcare in LMICs, the effectiveness of these approaches and the key enablers and barriers to strengthening governance.
We undertook a systematic search of databases of published articles and grey literature to identify eligible papers published since 2010, drawing on WHO's governance definition. Data were extracted into a pretested matrix and analysed using narrative synthesis, structured by WHO's six governance behaviours and an additional cross-cutting theme on capacities.
107 studies were selected as relevant, covering 101 LMICs. Qualitative methods and document/literature review were predominant. The findings demonstrate the relevance of the WHO governance behaviours, but the lack of robust evidence for approaches to implementing them. Valuable insights from the literature include the need for a clear vision around governance aims; the importance of ensuring that policy dialogue processes are inclusive and transparent, avoiding interest group capture; the benefits of exploiting synergies between governance mechanisms; and the need to develop capacity to enact governance among both public and private actors.
Governance choices shape not just the current health system, but also its future development. Common barriers to effective governance must be addressed in policy design, stakeholder engagement, public and private sector accountability, monitoring and capacity. Achieving this will require in-depth explorations of governance mechanisms and more rigorous documentation of implementation and outcomes in diverse contexts.
私营部门在提供和资助中低收入国家(LMICs)的医疗保健方面发挥着重要作用。支持政府有效地管理私营部门,从而改善整个卫生系统的结果,需要了解关于私营部门卫生部门治理的证据基础。本文报告了一项范围界定审查,该审查综合了关于在 LMICs 中管理私营部门提供和资助医疗保健的方法、这些方法的有效性以及加强治理的主要促进因素和障碍的证据。
我们系统地搜索了已发表文章和灰色文献的数据库,以确定自 2010 年以来发表的符合条件的论文,借鉴世卫组织的治理定义。将数据提取到一个预先测试的矩阵中,并使用叙述性综合分析进行分析,按照世卫组织的六个治理行为和一个关于能力的额外跨领域主题进行结构化。
选择了 107 项研究作为相关研究,涵盖了 101 个 LMICs。定性方法和文件/文献综述占主导地位。研究结果表明,世卫组织的治理行为具有相关性,但缺乏实施这些行为的可靠证据。文献中的宝贵见解包括:治理目标明确愿景的必要性;确保政策对话过程具有包容性和透明度,避免利益集团的控制;利用治理机制之间协同作用的好处;以及在公共和私营部门行为者中制定治理能力的必要性。
治理选择不仅塑造了当前的卫生系统,还塑造了未来的发展。在政策设计、利益相关者参与、公共和私营部门问责制、监测和能力方面,必须解决共同的有效治理障碍。实现这一目标将需要深入探索治理机制,并在不同背景下更严格地记录实施和结果。