Magruder Matthew L, Caughey Sarah, Carballo Camila, Eliasberg Claire D, Liu Yulei, Havasy Janice, Piacentini Alex, Rodeo Scott
Department of Regenerative Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
HSS J. 2025 May;21(2):174-183. doi: 10.1177/15563316241243371. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been shown to be a promising treatment for subacromial impingement, and although its interaction with aspirin (ASA) is controversial, many providers ask patients to stop non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use before PRP administration.
This studied aimed to identify the effect of PRP in a murine model of subacromial impingement and to explore the effect of ASA on PRP treatment.
A murine model of subacromial impingement was used, incorporating 48 wild-type C57BL/6 mice. After impingement surgery, mice received either human PRP activated via calcium chloride or saline injected into the subacromial space. The mice received either drinking water with ASA or standard drinking water, creating 4 groups: saline injection, saline injection + ASA, PRP injection, and PRP injection + ASA. All injections occurred at 3 weeks after impingement surgery, and mice were evaluated at 6 weeks. Each mouse underwent gait analysis, biomechanical analysis (N = 10 shoulders), histological analysis (N = 6), and gene expression analysis (N = 8).
Biomechanical testing showed increased load to failure in the PRP group compared to the ASA group, and increased stiffness in PRP vs saline, PRP vs ASA, and PRP vs ASA + PRP. Gene expression analysis identified 17 downregulated genes between the ASA + PRP and saline groups. Eight of these differentially expressed genes contribute to collagen biosynthesis and modification, 4 to extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis, and 4 to ECM degradation.
In this preliminary analysis, PRP injections in a murine model of subacromial impingement demonstrated mixed effects on tendon quality and pain, and ASA did not have a consistent effect on the response to PRP.
富血小板血浆(PRP)已被证明是治疗肩峰下撞击症的一种有前景的方法,尽管其与阿司匹林(ASA)的相互作用存在争议,但许多医疗服务提供者要求患者在进行PRP治疗前停止使用非甾体类抗炎药。
本研究旨在确定PRP在小鼠肩峰下撞击症模型中的作用,并探讨ASA对PRP治疗效果的影响。
使用小鼠肩峰下撞击症模型,纳入48只野生型C57BL/6小鼠。撞击手术后,小鼠接受通过氯化钙激活的人PRP或注入肩峰下间隙的生理盐水。小鼠饮用含ASA的水或标准饮用水,分为4组:生理盐水注射组、生理盐水注射+ASA组、PRP注射组和PRP注射+ASA组。所有注射均在撞击手术后3周进行,小鼠在6周时进行评估。每只小鼠均接受步态分析、生物力学分析(N = 10个肩部)、组织学分析(N = 6)和基因表达分析(N = 8)。
生物力学测试显示,与ASA组相比,PRP组的破坏负荷增加,且PRP与生理盐水、PRP与ASA、PRP与ASA + PRP相比,刚度增加。基因表达分析确定了ASA + PRP组和生理盐水组之间17个下调基因。这些差异表达基因中,8个有助于胶原蛋白的生物合成和修饰,4个参与细胞外基质(ECM)合成,4个参与ECM降解。
在这项初步分析中,在小鼠肩峰下撞击症模型中注射PRP对肌腱质量和疼痛的影响不一,且ASA对PRP治疗反应没有一致的影响。