Tesh S
Int J Health Serv. 1986;16(1):87-104. doi: 10.2190/HAA9-DU1Q-0QJR-4JE9.
Critics of health education policy in the United States fault it for ignoring the unequal ability of Americans to adopt more healthy behavior and for underestimating the social, economic, and political causes of disease. Many critics hypothesize that health education in a less bourgeois society would be more equitable and less individualistic. This article tests that hypothesis by analyzing the current Cuban health education program aimed at the reduction of chronic diseases. It argues that while the Cuban program appears to be every bit as individualistic as the North American program, theirs may not be comparable to ours because Cubans are less likely than Americans to reify the state. At least among supporters of the revolution, Cubans do not automatically make a conceptual distinction between the individual and the society. Discussions about responsibility for disease prevention take on new meaning in this light.
美国健康教育政策的批评者指责该政策忽视了美国人采取更健康行为的能力不平等,以及低估了疾病的社会、经济和政治成因。许多批评者推测,在一个不那么资产阶级化的社会中,健康教育会更加公平且更少个人主义色彩。本文通过分析当前旨在减少慢性病的古巴健康教育项目来验证这一推测。文章认为,虽然古巴的项目看起来与北美的项目一样个人主义,但两者可能不可相提并论,因为古巴人比美国人更不可能将国家具体化。至少在革命支持者中,古巴人不会自动在个人与社会之间做出概念区分。鉴于此,关于疾病预防责任的讨论便有了新的意义。