Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情后心理健康、健康相关生活质量与幸福感的关联:2023年初对14个欧洲国家的横断面比较

Relating mental health, health-related quality of life and well-being in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional comparison in 14 European countries in early 2023.

作者信息

Mao Zhuxin, Pepermans Koen, Beutels Philippe

机构信息

Centre for Health Economics Research and Modelling Infectious Diseases (CHERMID), University of Antwerp, Belgium.

Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

Public Health. 2025 Jan;238:16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.11.010. Epub 2024 Nov 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To understand country-level differences in the population's health and well-being in Europe in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, while also investigating the internal relationships among health and well-being outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS

We collected representative panel-based samples of 1000 adult respondents per country across 14 Western European countries in early 2023. The survey used standardised instruments to assess health and well-being, including EQ-5D-5L, GHQ-12, PHQ-9, general satisfaction, the Brief Resilience Scale and the ULS-6 (Loneliness) Scale. Summary statistics of the aggregate scores for each country were calculated and ranked. Multidimensional unfolding was used to visualize the rank relationships across countries and the indices, whereby a closer distance between a country and an index indicated a higher/better rank. Additionally, two key objective country-level indices (GDP growth rate and excess mortality rates) were integrated into the analysis.

RESULTS

Austria was found to report better status on most of the indices, while Sweden and the UK ranked consistently worse than the other countries. The loneliness, EQ-VAS and satisfaction scores were plotted further from the mental well-being scores and EQ-5D utility scores. Countries that did well in controlling excess mortality and maintaining economic growth tended to exhibit lower performance in self-reported well-being.

CONCLUSION

This study presents the variability in health and well-being across 14 West-European countries. Discrepancies between countries in self-reported outcomes reveal the complex interrelationship among different aspects of well-being. The study also highlights the complexities and challenges in optimising policies to maximize the overall well-being of society.

摘要

目的

了解新冠疫情后欧洲各国人口健康与福祉的差异,同时调查健康与福祉结果之间的内在关系。

研究设计

横断面研究。

方法

2023年初,我们在14个西欧国家每个国家收集了基于代表性样本的1000名成年受访者。该调查使用标准化工具评估健康与福祉,包括EQ-5D-5L、GHQ-12、PHQ-9、总体满意度、简易复原力量表和ULS-6(孤独)量表。计算并排列每个国家汇总分数的描述性统计量。使用多维展开法直观呈现各国与各项指标之间的排名关系,国家与指标之间距离越近表明排名越高/越好。此外,将两个关键的国家层面客观指标(GDP增长率和超额死亡率)纳入分析。

结果

发现奥地利在大多数指标上表现较好,而瑞典和英国的排名始终低于其他国家。孤独感、EQ-VAS和满意度得分与心理健康得分和EQ-5D效用得分的差距更大。在控制超额死亡率和维持经济增长方面表现良好的国家,在自我报告的福祉方面往往表现较差。

结论

本研究展示了14个西欧国家健康与福祉的差异。各国在自我报告结果上的差异揭示了福祉不同方面之间复杂的相互关系。该研究还凸显了优化政策以实现社会总体福祉最大化的复杂性和挑战。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验