Suppr超能文献

经皮穿刺腋动脉进行血管内介入治疗的可行性与安全性

Feasibility and Safety of Endovascular Interventions via Percutaneous Access to the Axillary Artery.

作者信息

Alterman Caleb D, Perera Anton D, Gupta Prateek K, Alterman Daniel M

机构信息

Vascular and Vein Institute of the South, Germantown, TN.

Vascular and Vein Institute of the South, Germantown, TN.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2025 Feb;111:194-202. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.10.018. Epub 2024 Nov 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endovascular treatment of peripheral arterial disease requires safe and reliable arterial access. This study evaluates the feasibility and safety of percutaneous axillary artery access for endovascular therapy. A variety of anatomic and logistic obstacles can be overcome with upper extremity access. In this retrospective case review, we describe our experience with percutaneous trans-axillary access for lower extremity peripheral arterial disease intervention.

METHODS

Medical records of all patients undergoing axillary artery percutaneous access from December 2021 to August 2024 were reviewed. Demographic data, procedural details, and complications such as pseudoaneurysm, hematoma, nerve injury, and closure device success were analyzed. Technical success and perioperative complications-including bruising, edema, hematoma, nerve injury, infection, thrombosis, and pseudoaneurysm-were assessed. Clinical outcomes were analyzed via follow-up clinic records.

RESULTS

During the study period, 79 axillary artery accesses were performed on 64 patients. The patients were 55% male and had typical vascular comorbidities: hypertension (87%), hyperlipidemia (68%), coronary artery disease (27%), stroke (19%), and diabetes (16%); 58% were active tobacco users, and 80% were former tobacco users. Axillary access facilitated peripheral endovascular procedures, including iliac intervention (55), femoral (44), mesenteric (16), tibial (11), and embolization or visceral aneurysm treatments. A 6F sheath and ultrasound-guided Angio-Seal closure device were uniformly employed, with no major complications, perioperative deaths, or reoperations required. Minor complications of bruising and edema were present in 11 patients (14%). Other minor complications such as hematoma, nerve injury, thrombosis, dissection, pseudoaneurysm, or limb ischemia were absent.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous axillary artery access demonstrates promise for complex endovascular interventions with a favorable safety profile. Advantages include avoidance of unfavorable femoral anatomy, improved working length compared with radial access, and enhanced control of visceral therapy. Bilateral iliac and lower extremity therapy is feasible in a single treatment as well. Percutaneous axillary artery access is a safe, reliable adjunct for enhancing endovascular arterial intervention capabilities.

摘要

背景

外周动脉疾病的血管内治疗需要安全可靠的动脉入路。本研究评估经皮腋动脉入路用于血管内治疗的可行性和安全性。上肢入路可克服多种解剖和后勤方面的障碍。在本回顾性病例分析中,我们描述了经皮经腋动脉入路用于下肢外周动脉疾病干预的经验。

方法

回顾了2021年12月至2024年8月期间所有接受腋动脉经皮入路的患者的病历。分析了人口统计学数据、手术细节以及诸如假性动脉瘤、血肿、神经损伤和闭合装置成功率等并发症。评估了技术成功率和围手术期并发症,包括瘀斑、水肿、血肿、神经损伤、感染、血栓形成和假性动脉瘤。通过随访门诊记录分析临床结果。

结果

在研究期间,对64例患者进行了79次腋动脉入路操作。患者中男性占55%,具有典型的血管合并症:高血压(87%)、高脂血症(68%)、冠状动脉疾病(27%)、中风(19%)和糖尿病(16%);58%为现吸烟者,80%为既往吸烟者。腋动脉入路有助于进行外周血管内手术,包括髂动脉介入治疗(55例)、股动脉介入治疗(44例)、肠系膜动脉介入治疗(16例)、胫动脉介入治疗(11例)以及栓塞或内脏动脉瘤治疗。均采用6F鞘管和超声引导下的Angio-Seal闭合装置,未出现重大并发症、围手术期死亡或需要再次手术的情况。11例患者(14%)出现瘀斑和水肿等轻微并发症。未出现血肿、神经损伤、血栓形成、夹层分离、假性动脉瘤或肢体缺血等其他轻微并发症。

结论

经皮腋动脉入路在复杂血管内介入治疗中显示出良好前景,安全性良好。其优点包括避免不理想的股动脉解剖结构、与桡动脉入路相比工作长度增加以及对内脏治疗的控制增强。单次治疗中双侧髂动脉和下肢治疗也是可行的。经皮腋动脉入路是增强血管内动脉介入能力的一种安全、可靠的辅助方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验