• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Ripple 框架:通过生成和关系方法在护理中共同创造社会、文化和经济价值。

The Ripple Framework: Co-Producing Social, Cultural, and Economic Value in Care Through a Generative and Relational Approach.

机构信息

The Institute for Design Informatics, Edinburgh College of Arts, College of Art, Humanities and Social Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 9DF, UK.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Nov 15;21(11):1521. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21111521.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph21111521
PMID:39595788
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11593386/
Abstract

Work has been undertaken in the healthcare sector to explore ways of co-producing design responses with different communities and organisations. However, we lack empirical analysis of how design thinking can help tackle complexity. To assist the Healthier Working Lives programme, we curated the Ripple Framework to develop trust and attempt to address the challenges of complexity in residential care. Through a generative design process, data were used to collaboratively define bespoke co-design pathways with 31 participants from six Scottish care providers over ten months. Thematic, content, and matrix analyses produced insights to inform vignettes illustrating how design responded to complex social care sector needs, with a particular focus on the fulfilment and flourishing of the care workforce. Drawing on our empirical material and using the Design Research Value Model, we illustrate how we have developed social, cultural, and economic value in care through co-design, enabling an opportunity to test the novel methodology.

摘要

医疗保健领域已经开展了一些工作,旨在探索与不同社区和组织共同设计应对方案的方法。然而,我们缺乏关于设计思维如何帮助应对复杂性的实证分析。为了协助“更健康的工作生活”计划,我们策划了 Ripple 框架来建立信任,并尝试解决养老院护理中的复杂性挑战。通过生成式设计过程,我们在十个月内与来自苏格兰六家养老院的 31 名参与者共同使用数据来定义定制的共同设计路径。主题、内容和矩阵分析产生了一些见解,这些见解通过说明性故事的形式展示了设计如何应对复杂的社会关怀部门的需求,特别关注护理人员的实现和繁荣。借鉴我们的实证材料,并使用设计研究价值模型,我们展示了如何通过共同设计在关怀中发展社会、文化和经济价值,为测试新方法提供了机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7284/11593386/c6c033b3f142/ijerph-21-01521-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7284/11593386/2f26383499fd/ijerph-21-01521-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7284/11593386/b2df22cd032d/ijerph-21-01521-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7284/11593386/59491de068cc/ijerph-21-01521-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7284/11593386/906e22db41b1/ijerph-21-01521-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7284/11593386/e15dfe14f280/ijerph-21-01521-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7284/11593386/9fc0a73ea9f1/ijerph-21-01521-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7284/11593386/d36ac290637c/ijerph-21-01521-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7284/11593386/6cc74ca58254/ijerph-21-01521-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7284/11593386/c6c033b3f142/ijerph-21-01521-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7284/11593386/2f26383499fd/ijerph-21-01521-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7284/11593386/b2df22cd032d/ijerph-21-01521-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7284/11593386/59491de068cc/ijerph-21-01521-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7284/11593386/906e22db41b1/ijerph-21-01521-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7284/11593386/e15dfe14f280/ijerph-21-01521-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7284/11593386/9fc0a73ea9f1/ijerph-21-01521-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7284/11593386/d36ac290637c/ijerph-21-01521-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7284/11593386/6cc74ca58254/ijerph-21-01521-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7284/11593386/c6c033b3f142/ijerph-21-01521-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
The Ripple Framework: Co-Producing Social, Cultural, and Economic Value in Care Through a Generative and Relational Approach.Ripple 框架:通过生成和关系方法在护理中共同创造社会、文化和经济价值。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Nov 15;21(11):1521. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21111521.
2
Unlocking data: Decision-maker perspectives on cross-sectoral data sharing and linkage as part of a whole-systems approach to public health policy and practice.解锁数据:决策者对跨部门数据共享与关联的看法,这是公共卫生政策与实践全系统方法的一部分。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Nov 20:1-30. doi: 10.3310/KYTW2173.
3
Intersecting factors of disadvantage and discrimination and their effect on daily life during the coronavirus pandemic: the CICADA-ME mixed-methods study.新冠疫情期间不利因素与歧视的交叉影响及其对日常生活的作用:CICADA-ME混合方法研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Feb;13(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/KYTF4381.
4
Lessons from a research partnership in southwest England to understand community palliative care needs in rural, coastal and low-income communities.英格兰西南部一项研究合作项目的经验教训,旨在了解农村、沿海和低收入社区的社区姑息治疗需求。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Feb 28:1-40. doi: 10.3310/ATFA4287.
5
Towards achieving interorganisational collaboration between health-care providers: a realist evidence synthesis.实现医疗机构间合作的途径:一项基于实际证据的系统综述。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jun;11(6):1-130. doi: 10.3310/KPLT1423.
6
REALITIES in health disparities: Researching Evidence-based Alternatives in Living, Imaginative, Traumatised, Integrated, Embodied Systems.健康差异的现实:在有生命力的、富有想象力的、受创伤的、整合的、体现的系统中研究基于证据的替代方案。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 19;12:1391084. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1391084. eCollection 2024.
7
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
8
Using Palliative Care Needs Rounds in the UK for care home staff and residents: an implementation science study.在英国,使用姑息治疗需求评估小组为养老院工作人员和居民提供服务:一项实施科学研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(19):1-134. doi: 10.3310/KRWQ5829.
9
Co-creation of new knowledge: Good fortune or good management?新知识的共同创造:是运气还是良好管理?
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Nov 29;8(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00394-2.
10
Understanding and using experiences of social care to guide service improvements: translating a co-design approach from health to social care.理解和利用社会关怀经验指导服务改进:将共同设计方法从卫生领域转化到社会关怀领域。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Aug;12(27):1-84. doi: 10.3310/MYHT8970.