Faculty of Sport Sciences, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat 60250, Türkiye.
Department of Team Games, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, 51-612 Wroclaw, Poland.
Nutrients. 2024 Nov 15;16(22):3910. doi: 10.3390/nu16223910.
Mouth rinsing (MR) with a carbohydrate solution is one of the most popular methods athletes use to improve their game-based performance due to its acute ergogenic effect.
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the carbohydrate MR intervention on psychophysiological responses and kinematic profiles during intermittent () and continuous () 4-a-side small-sided soccer games (SSGs).
Thirty-two adolescent soccer players (age: 16.5 ± 0.5 years) played six bouts of 4-a-side SSGs with MR or MR at 3-day intervals in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, and crossover study design. Psychophysiological responses and kinematic profiles were continuously recorded during all games. The rating of perceived exertion (RPE), the rating scale of mental effort (RSME), and the physical enjoyment scores (PES) were also determined at the end of each game.
The MR induced higher psychophysiological responses such as RPE, internal training load (ITL), and RSME ( ≤ 0.05, values ranging from 0.50 to 1.04 [small to moderate effect]). Conversely, the MR induced higher PES ( ≤ 0.05, values = 1.44 [large effect]) compared to MR. Although the MR intervention led to similar improvements in the performance of 4-a-side MR and MR, there was no significant difference between the groups.
Our results suggest that the MR intervention can be used as an effective ergogenic supplement for acute game performance enhancement, regardless of the game's structure.
运动员常采用口腔漱口(MR)的方法来提高比赛表现,因为它具有急性的运动功效。
本研究旨在评估碳水化合物 MR 干预对间歇性()和连续性()4 对 4 小型足球比赛(SSG)的心理生理反应和运动学特征的影响。
32 名青少年足球运动员(年龄:16.5±0.5 岁)在一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉研究设计中,以 3 天为间隔进行 6 次 4 对 4 SSG 比赛,其中包括 MR 或 MR。在所有比赛中连续记录心理生理反应和运动学特征。在每轮比赛结束时还确定了主观体力感觉等级(RPE)、心理努力等级(RSME)和身体愉悦评分(PES)。
MR 引起了更高的心理生理反应,如 RPE、内部训练负荷(ITL)和 RSME(≤0.05,值范围为 0.50 至 1.04[小到中等效应])。相反,与 MR 相比,MR 诱导更高的 PES(≤0.05,值=1.44[大效应])。尽管 MR 干预导致 4 对 4 MR 和 MR 的比赛表现相似的改善,但两组之间没有显著差异。
我们的结果表明,MR 干预可作为急性比赛表现增强的有效运动功效补充剂,而与比赛结构无关。