Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Nov 27;32(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01295-x.
In 2017 the Swedish public insurance company Löf published national guidelines for in-hospital trauma team activation (TTA), which are now widely adopted in Sweden. No studies have examined triage accuracy at non-trauma-center hospitals in the Stockholm trauma system since the implementation of the new TTA criteria.
To assess trauma triage accuracy at one non-trauma-center hospital in Stockholm.
3528 trauma patients treated at Södersjukhuset during 2019-2022 were acquired from the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau) to calculate TTA triage accuracy. Undertriage was defined in accordance with national guidelines as patients with a New Injury Severity Score > 15 who did not prompt level 1 TTA on arrival to hospital.
In total there were 849 severely injured patients during the study period, of which 2.2% (n = 19) prompted TTA level 1, corresponding to an undertriage of 98% (n = 830). Of the 849 severely injured patients, 41% (n = 348) prompted TTA level 2 whereas the remaining 57% (n = 482) prompted no TTA on arrival to hospital. There were a total of 3046 patients prompting TTA during the study period, but only 19% (n = 19) of level 1 and 12% (n = 348) of level 2 patients were severely injured, and 45% had a NISS ≤ 3.
Undertriage of severely injured trauma patients was 98% according to the definition specified by Swedish trauma triage guidelines, higher than reasonably acceptable. There is considerable overtriage with non-severely injured patients prompting TTA. However, the suitability of using NISS > 15 to retrospectively define the need for TTA is debatable as this does not always correlate with the fulfillment of the TTA criteria. Further investigation of adherence to trauma triage guidelines in clinical practice may be of value to improve triage accuracy in organized regional trauma systems.
2017 年,瑞典公共保险公司 Löf 发布了院内创伤团队激活(TTA)的国家指南,该指南现已在瑞典广泛采用。自新 TTA 标准实施以来,斯德哥尔摩创伤系统中尚未有研究评估非创伤中心医院的分诊准确性。
评估斯德哥尔摩一家非创伤中心医院的创伤分诊准确性。
从瑞典创伤登记处(SweTrau)获取 2019-2022 年在 Södersjukhuset 接受治疗的 3528 例创伤患者,以计算 TTA 分诊准确性。根据国家指南,分诊不足定义为新损伤严重程度评分>15 的患者到达医院时未触发 1 级 TTA。
在研究期间共有 849 例严重受伤患者,其中 2.2%(n=19)触发 1 级 TTA,分诊不足率为 98%(n=830)。在 849 例严重受伤患者中,41%(n=348)触发 2 级 TTA,而其余 57%(n=482)到达医院时未触发 TTA。在研究期间共有 3046 例患者触发 TTA,但只有 19%(n=19)的 1 级和 12%(n=348)的 2 级患者为严重受伤,且 45%的患者新损伤严重程度评分≤3。
根据瑞典创伤分诊指南规定的定义,严重创伤患者分诊不足率为 98%,高于合理可接受水平。大量非严重受伤患者触发 TTA,存在明显的过度分诊。然而,使用新损伤严重程度评分>15 来回顾性定义 TTA 的需求是否合理存在争议,因为这并不总是与 TTA 标准的满足相关。进一步调查临床实践中对创伤分诊指南的遵循情况可能有助于提高有组织的区域性创伤系统的分诊准确性。