Ramírez-Pérez Laura, Kerr Graham K, Cuesta-Vargas Antonio I
Department of Physiotherapy, University of Málaga, The Institute of Biomedical Research in Málaga (IBIMA), Clinimetric Group FE-14, C/Arquitecto Francisco Peñalosa, 3, Málaga 29071, Spain.
School of Clinical Science, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, ARC ITTC for Joint Biomechanics, 2 George St, Brisbane City, QLD 4000, Australia.
Gait Posture. 2025 Feb;116:30-39. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.11.010. Epub 2024 Nov 23.
The shoulder complex, which has the highest prevalence of instability, is currently, the subject of considerable debate regarding the methodologies used to assess shoulder stability during dynamic exercises.
The primary aim is to summarize evidence on various methodologies used to evaluate shoulder stability during dynamic exercises.
This scoping review included cross-sectional studies focusing on various evaluation techniques to assess shoulder forces, kinetics, and stability during dynamic movements. In analyzing each study, the selected data included population profile, sample size, exercise type, and evaluation methodology used.
Twenty-seven studies with a total of 1187 subjects were included. Among the studies, various dynamic exercises were evaluated, including throwing exercises, movements with dumbbells or elastic bands, push-ups, and functional tasks. Most evaluation techniques were combined, with eleven studies using surface electromyography; seven used dynamometers to obtain direct strength measurements; two used six-force axis sensors; one utilized force platforms; and one was focused on the loss of speed using linear velocity transducers. Furthermore, motion capture systems such as high-speed cameras were used in fourteen studies. In conclusion, surface electromyography and high-speed cameras are the primary techniques for measuring muscle activity and kinetic and kinematic data. However, they do not directly measure glenohumeral stability, meaning further research is needed to develop reliable methodologies for this purpose.
This study holds significant relevance in the field of shoulder instability and has clear clinical implications, as it establishes the primary tools for estimating glenohumeral stability, which could enable patient stratification and the design of optimal intervention programs based on these measurements.
肩部复合体的不稳定发生率最高,目前,关于在动态运动中评估肩部稳定性所使用的方法存在相当大的争议。
主要目的是总结在动态运动中用于评估肩部稳定性的各种方法的证据。
本范围综述纳入了横断面研究,重点关注在动态运动中评估肩部力量、动力学和稳定性的各种评估技术。在分析每项研究时,所选数据包括人群概况、样本量、运动类型和所使用的评估方法。
纳入了27项研究,共1187名受试者。在这些研究中,评估了各种动态运动,包括投掷运动、使用哑铃或弹力带的运动、俯卧撑和功能性任务。大多数评估技术是综合使用的,11项研究使用表面肌电图;7项使用测力计获得直接力量测量值;2项使用六力轴传感器;1项使用力平台;1项使用线性速度传感器关注速度损失。此外,14项研究使用了高速摄像机等运动捕捉系统。总之,表面肌电图和高速摄像机是测量肌肉活动以及动力学和运动学数据的主要技术。然而,它们不能直接测量盂肱关节稳定性,这意味着需要进一步研究来为此开发可靠的方法。
本研究在肩部不稳定领域具有重要意义,具有明确的临床意义,因为它确立了估计盂肱关节稳定性的主要工具,这可以实现患者分层,并基于这些测量设计最佳干预方案。