D'Adamo Laura, Shonrock Abigail T, Monocello Lawrence, Goldberg Jake, Yaeger Lauren H, Pearl Rebecca L, Wilfley Denise E
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences and Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science (WELL Center), Drexel University, 3201 Chestnut St., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida College of Public Health and Health Professions, Gainesville, FL, USA.
J Eat Disord. 2024 Nov 29;12(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s40337-024-01132-7.
Internalized weight stigma (IWS) is highly prevalent and associated with deleterious mental and physical health outcomes. Initiatives are needed to address IWS and promote effective coping and resilience among individuals who are exposed to weight stigma. We conducted a systematic scoping review of the literature on psychological interventions for IWS and explored their intervention components, feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy at reducing IWS and related negative physiological and psychological health outcomes.
Eight databases were searched. Inclusion criteria included: (1) Psychological intervention; (2) Published in English; and (3) Included IWS as an outcome. Exclusion criteria included: (1) Commentary or review; and (2) Not a psychological intervention. A narrative review framework was used to synthesize results.
Of 161 articles screened, 20 were included. Included interventions demonstrated high feasibility, acceptability, and engagement overall. Sixteen of 20 included studies observed significant reductions in IWS that were maintained over follow-up periods, yet data on whether interventions produced greater reductions than control conditions were mixed. Studies observed significant improvements in numerous physical and mental health outcomes.
Findings suggest that existing interventions are feasible, acceptable, and may provide meaningful improvements in IWS and associated health outcomes, highlighting the potential for psychological interventions to promote improved health and wellbeing in individuals with IWS. High-quality studies using rigorous study designs (e.g., randomized controlled trials) are needed to further evaluate the efficacy of interventions for IWS.
内化的体重污名(IWS)非常普遍,且与有害的身心健康结果相关。需要采取措施来解决IWS问题,并促进那些遭受体重污名的个体进行有效的应对并增强恢复力。我们对关于IWS心理干预的文献进行了系统的范围综述,并探讨了它们的干预组成部分、可行性、可接受性,以及在减少IWS和相关负面生理及心理健康结果方面的初步效果。
检索了八个数据库。纳入标准包括:(1)心理干预;(2)以英文发表;(3)将IWS作为一个结果纳入。排除标准包括:(1)评论或综述;(2)不是心理干预。采用叙述性综述框架来综合结果。
在筛选的161篇文章中,纳入了20篇。纳入的干预措施总体上显示出高可行性、可接受性和参与度。20项纳入研究中的16项观察到IWS有显著降低,且在随访期内保持,但关于干预措施是否比对照条件产生更大降低的数据不一。研究观察到许多身心健康结果有显著改善。
研究结果表明,现有干预措施是可行的、可接受的,并且可能在IWS及相关健康结果方面带来有意义的改善,突出了心理干预在促进IWS个体健康和幸福方面的潜力。需要高质量的研究采用严谨的研究设计(如随机对照试验)来进一步评估IWS干预措施的效果。