Vadi Sonali, Gudka Shreya, Deo Priyadarshini
Intensive Care Unit, Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital and Medical Research Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Cancer and Palliative Care, Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital and Medical Research Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Indian J Palliat Care. 2024 Oct-Dec;30(4):366-374. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_48_2024. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
Mortality is a common gauged endpoint in critically ill patients. Reduced quality of life is an aligned repercussion of protracted critical illness. Baseline status, severity of illness and its trajectory influence the outcomes. Patient-oriented outcomes are those that matter the most to a patient. However, quite often, family approves of trade-offs with survivorship in the Indian context. We looked at non-mortality outcomes in patients on high-intensity life-sustaining interventions admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) despite poor prognosis and died on full support or survived to be completely dependent.
In this retrospective chart review study, we studied patients (1) who spent more than 1 month in the hospital enduring a myriad of distressing physical and psychological vicissitudes, (2) whose primary illness was fairly advanced (3) and either succumbed or survived to be impeded in their response to cognitive assessment and with severe functional impairment. Patient demographics, comorbidities, pre-morbid functional status, burden of critical illness, use of life-sustaining therapies, functional dependence in the last week of ICU stay, best neurological status in the last week pre-death or discharge, dying trajectories and economic analysis were noted.
Trends of clinical progress of 23 patients were deliberated. The mean age of males was 65 years and 61 years for females. Five patients had a Barthel index score of 10-20, indicating total dependency and two patients had a score of 21-60, indicating severe dependency. Two patients were cognitively impaired at baseline. The worst neurological status in the week before death or discharge was eye1, motor1, and verbaltracheostomised. Thirteen patients succumbed during ongoing treatment.
Daily discussions on the dynamics of illness progression need to take place with family on a regular basis for patients managed in ICU. Realistic perceptions and grounded expectations from the families and caregivers are necessary for patient-centred outcomes.
死亡率是危重症患者常用的衡量终点。生活质量下降是危重症病程延长的一个相关后果。基线状态、疾病严重程度及其发展轨迹会影响预后。以患者为导向的结局是对患者最重要的结局。然而,在印度的情况下,家人往往会同意在生存方面进行权衡。我们研究了入住重症监护病房(ICU)并接受高强度生命维持干预的患者的非死亡结局,尽管预后不良,这些患者在完全支持下死亡或存活但完全依赖他人。
在这项回顾性病历审查研究中,我们研究了以下患者:(1)在医院度过超过1个月,忍受了无数令人痛苦的身体和心理变化;(2)其原发性疾病相当严重;(3)要么死亡,要么存活但在认知评估反应方面受到阻碍且存在严重功能障碍。记录了患者的人口统计学信息、合并症、病前功能状态、危重症负担、生命维持治疗的使用情况、ICU住院最后一周的功能依赖情况、死亡或出院前最后一周的最佳神经状态、死亡轨迹和经济分析。
对23例患者的临床进展趋势进行了分析。男性的平均年龄为65岁,女性为61岁。5例患者的巴氏指数评分为10 - 20,表明完全依赖,2例患者的评分为21 - 60,表明严重依赖。2例患者基线时存在认知障碍。死亡或出院前一周最差的神经状态为睁眼1级、运动1级和气管切开后言语不清。13例患者在治疗过程中死亡。
对于在ICU接受治疗的患者,需要定期与家属就疾病进展的动态进行日常讨论。为了实现以患者为中心的结局,家属和护理人员要有现实的认知和合理的期望。