Kavanagh Matthew M, Radakrishnan Adi, Unnikrishnan Vishakh, Cometto Giorgio, Kane Catherine, Friedman Eric A, Srivatsan Varsha, Abinader Luis Gil, Campbell James
Department of Global Health, Georgetown University School of Health, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Center for Global Health Policy & Politics, O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC, United States of America.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Dec 9;4(12):e0003767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003767. eCollection 2024.
The unprecedented and multi-faceted challenges health and care workers faced during the COVID-19 pandemic inspired the world's health ministers to call for a new Global Health and Care Worker Compact at the 74th World Health Assembly in 2021. The Care Compact identifies key areas where governments can use law and policy to prevent harm, provide support, ensure inclusivity, and safeguard rights of health and care workers toward improving population health. Using policy surveillance methods, we conducted an empirical analysis of the national law and policy environments on health and care workers' protection and rights in 182 countries. Across 10 indicators, 1,262 laws and policies were identified and analyzed for their alignment with the international legal standards. Analysis shows significant gaps. 62% of all national laws are aligned. Nearly every country has multiple areas where national laws are not yet aligned with the Care Compact. Though alignment is feasible. In 5 of 6 regions at least one country has laws aligned on all indicators. Geographic region was not a significant predictor of alignment, while income level was only weakly associated. Comparing the key legal issues facing health and care workers, well over half of countries studied are fully aligned with the Care Compact on occupational health and safety, fair remuneration, enabling work environments, freedom of association, and collective bargaining. Approximately 50% of countries studied are fully aligned on protections against violence and harassment in the workplace and whistleblower protections. But less than 25% are fully aligned on access to health services in occupational settings and equal treatment and non-discrimination. Together this analysis highlights the need for, and opportunity of, law reform in countries throughout the world to elevate and protect the rights and well-being of health and care workers and, in doing so, improve health systems.
在新冠疫情期间,卫生和护理工作者面临着前所未有的多方面挑战,这促使世界各国卫生部长在2021年第74届世界卫生大会上呼吁制定一项新的《全球卫生和护理工作者契约》。该《护理契约》确定了政府可以利用法律和政策来预防伤害、提供支持、确保包容性以及保障卫生和护理工作者权利以改善人群健康的关键领域。我们运用政策监测方法,对182个国家关于卫生和护理工作者保护及权利的国家法律和政策环境进行了实证分析。在10项指标中,共确定并分析了1262项法律和政策与国际法律标准的一致性。分析显示存在重大差距。所有国家法律中62%符合要求。几乎每个国家都有多个领域的国家法律尚未与《护理契约》保持一致。不过保持一致是可行的。在6个地区中的5个地区,至少有一个国家的法律在所有指标上都符合要求。地理区域并非一致性的重要预测因素,而收入水平的关联度也很弱。比较卫生和护理工作者面临的关键法律问题,超过一半的受研究国家在职业健康与安全、公平薪酬、有利的工作环境、结社自由和集体谈判方面与《护理契约》完全一致。约50%的受研究国家在工作场所预防暴力和骚扰以及举报人保护方面完全一致。但在职业环境中获得卫生服务以及平等待遇和非歧视方面,完全一致的国家不到25%。总体而言,这一分析凸显了世界各国进行法律改革的必要性和机遇,以提升和保护卫生和护理工作者的权利与福祉,进而改善卫生系统。