Sease Jasmine, Kemp Candace L
The Gerontology Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Department of Sociology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
J Appl Gerontol. 2024 Dec 17:7334648241306572. doi: 10.1177/07334648241306572.
Early in our longitudinal qualitative study on meaningful engagement and quality of life among assisted living (AL) residents with dementia, researchers observed differences between the activities scheduled on monthly engagement calendars and those taking place. Yet, we were unable to identify any research examining such deviations or their implications. Thus, drawing on data from three diverse AL communities studied over a one-year period, we aim to: 1) examine deviations in scheduled engagement programming; 2) identify influential factors; and 3) understand resident outcomes. Our analysis identified general adherence to calendars but also deviations involving cancellations and substitutions. Factors influencing deviations included staff and staffing, engagement capacity, programming guidance and support, care staff attitudes and beliefs, and unforeseen circumstances. Cancellations typically meant resident inactivity and sometimes boredom, disappointment, and anxiety; substitutions appear less detrimental. This analysis has implications for research and practice and underscores the significance of engagement among persons living with dementia.
在我们对患有痴呆症的辅助生活(AL)居民的有意义参与和生活质量进行的纵向定性研究初期,研究人员观察到月度参与日程表上安排的活动与实际发生的活动之间存在差异。然而,我们未能找到任何研究此类偏差或其影响的文献。因此,利用在一年时间里对三个不同的辅助生活社区收集的数据,我们旨在:1)检查预定参与计划中的偏差;2)确定影响因素;3)了解居民的结果。我们的分析发现,虽然总体上遵守日程表,但也存在涉及取消和替换的偏差。影响偏差的因素包括工作人员和人员配置、参与能力、计划指导和支持、护理人员的态度和信念以及意外情况。取消活动通常意味着居民不活动,有时还会感到无聊、失望和焦虑;替换活动似乎危害较小。该分析对研究和实践具有启示意义,并强调了痴呆症患者参与活动的重要性。