Bertie Lizel-Antoinette, Quiroz Juan C, Berkovsky Shlomo, Arendt Kristian, Bögels Susan, Coleman Jonathan R I, Cooper Peter, Creswell Cathy, Eley Thalia C, Hartman Catharina, Fjermestadt Krister, In-Albon Tina, Lavallee Kristen, Lester Kathryn J, Lyneham Heidi J, Marin Carla E, McKinnon Anna, McLellan Lauren F, Meiser-Stedman Richard, Nauta Maaike, Rapee Ronald M, Schneider Silvia, Schniering Carolyn, Silverman Wendy K, Thastum Mikael, Thirlwall Kerstin, Waite Polly, Wergeland Gro Janne, Wuthrich Viviana, Hudson Jennifer L
Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
School of Psychology, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
Psychol Med. 2024 Dec 17:1-11. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724002654.
The identification of predictors of treatment response is crucial for improving treatment outcome for children with anxiety disorders. Machine learning methods provide opportunities to identify combinations of factors that contribute to risk prediction models.
A machine learning approach was applied to predict anxiety disorder remission in a large sample of 2114 anxious youth (5-18 years). Potential predictors included demographic, clinical, parental, and treatment variables with data obtained pre-treatment, post-treatment, and at least one follow-up.
All machine learning models performed similarly for remission outcomes, with AUC between 0.67 and 0.69. There was significant alignment between the factors that contributed to the models predicting two target outcomes: remission of all anxiety disorders and the primary anxiety disorder. Children who were older, had multiple anxiety disorders, comorbid depression, comorbid externalising disorders, received group treatment and therapy delivered by a more experienced therapist, and who had a parent with higher anxiety and depression symptoms, were more likely than other children to still meet criteria for anxiety disorders at the completion of therapy. In both models, the absence of a social anxiety disorder and being treated by a therapist with less experience contributed to the model predicting a higher likelihood of remission.
These findings underscore the utility of prediction models that may indicate which children are more likely to remit or are more at risk of non-remission following CBT for childhood anxiety.
确定治疗反应的预测因素对于改善焦虑症儿童的治疗效果至关重要。机器学习方法为识别有助于风险预测模型的因素组合提供了机会。
应用机器学习方法对2114名焦虑青少年(5 - 18岁)的大样本进行焦虑症缓解情况预测。潜在预测因素包括人口统计学、临床、父母及治疗变量,数据来自治疗前、治疗后及至少一次随访。
所有机器学习模型在缓解结果方面表现相似,曲线下面积(AUC)在0.67至0.69之间。预测两个目标结果(所有焦虑症缓解和原发性焦虑症缓解)的模型所涉及的因素之间存在显著一致性。年龄较大、患有多种焦虑症、合并抑郁症、合并外化性障碍、接受团体治疗以及由经验更丰富的治疗师提供治疗,且父母有较高焦虑和抑郁症状的儿童,在治疗结束时比其他儿童更有可能仍符合焦虑症标准。在两个模型中,不存在社交焦虑症以及由经验较少的治疗师进行治疗,使得模型预测缓解可能性更高。
这些发现强调了预测模型的实用性,该模型可能表明哪些儿童在接受儿童焦虑症认知行为疗法(CBT)后更有可能缓解或更有不缓解的风险。