Suppr超能文献

使用与皮质BOLD MRI交错的实时相位对比脑脊液流动来评估BOLD-脑脊液动力学。

BOLD-CSF dynamics assessed using real-time phase contrast CSF flow interleaved with cortical BOLD MRI.

作者信息

Roefs Emiel C A, Eiling Ingmar, de Bresser Jeroen, van Osch Matthias J P, Hirschler Lydiane

机构信息

C.J. Gorter MRI Center, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Fluids Barriers CNS. 2024 Dec 24;21(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12987-024-00607-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) motion and pulsatility has been proposed to play a crucial role in clearing brain waste. Although its driving forces remain debated, increasing evidence suggests that large amplitude vasomotion drives such CSF fluctuations. Recently, a fast blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI sequence was used to measure the coupling between CSF fluctuations and low-frequency hemodynamic oscillations in the human cortex. However, this technique is not quantitative, only captures unidirectional flow and is sensitive to B0-fluctuations. Real-time phase contrast (pcCSF) instead measures CSF flow dynamics in a fast, quantitative, bidirectional and B0-insensitive manner, but lacks information on hemodynamic brain oscillations. In this study we propose to combine the strengths of both sequences by interleaving real-time phase contrast with a cortical BOLD scan, thereby enabling the quantification of the interaction between CSF flow and cortical BOLD.

METHODS

Two experiments were performed. First, we compared the CSF flow measured using real-time phase contrast (pcCSF) with the inflow-sensitized BOLD (iCSF) measurements by interleaving both techniques at the repetition level and planning them at the same location. Next, we compared the BOLD-CSF coupling obtained using the novel pcCSF interleaved with cortical BOLD to the coupling obtained with the original iCSF. To time-lock the CSF fluctuations, participants were instructed to perform slow, abdominal paced breathing.

RESULTS

pcCSF captures bidirectional CSF dynamics with a more pronounced in- and outflow curve than the original iCSF method. With the pcCSF method, the BOLD-CSF coupling was stronger (mean cross-correlation peak increase = 0.22, p = .008) and with a 1.9 s shorter temporal lag (p = .016), as compared to using the original iCSF technique.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we introduce a new method to study the coupling of CSF flow measured in the fourth ventricle to cortical BOLD fluctuations. In contrast to the original approach, the use of phase contrast MRI to measure CSF flow provides a quantitative in- and outflow curve, and improved BOLD-CSF coupling metrics.

摘要

背景

脑脊液(CSF)的流动和搏动被认为在清除脑内废物中起关键作用。尽管其驱动力仍存在争议,但越来越多的证据表明大幅度血管运动驱动了此类脑脊液波动。最近,一种快速血氧水平依赖性功能磁共振成像(BOLD fMRI)序列被用于测量人类皮质中脑脊液波动与低频血流动力学振荡之间的耦合。然而,该技术不具有定量性,仅能捕捉单向流动且对B0波动敏感。实时相位对比(pcCSF)则以快速、定量、双向且对B0不敏感的方式测量脑脊液流动动力学,但缺乏关于血流动力学脑振荡的信息。在本研究中,我们建议通过将实时相位对比与皮质BOLD扫描交错进行,来结合两种序列的优势,从而能够对脑脊液流动与皮质BOLD之间的相互作用进行量化。

方法

进行了两项实验。首先,我们通过在重复层面交错使用这两种技术并将它们规划在同一位置,比较了使用实时相位对比(pcCSF)测量的脑脊液流动与流入敏感型BOLD(iCSF)测量结果。接下来,我们将使用新型pcCSF与皮质BOLD交错获得的BOLD - CSF耦合与使用原始iCSF获得的耦合进行了比较。为了使脑脊液波动时间锁定,参与者被指示进行缓慢的腹部同步呼吸。

结果

与原始的iCSF方法相比,pcCSF捕捉到了双向脑脊液动力学,流入和流出曲线更为明显。与使用原始iCSF技术相比,使用pcCSF方法时,BOLD - CSF耦合更强(平均互相关峰值增加 = 0.22,p = 0.008),且时间滞后缩短了1.9秒(p = 0.016)。

结论

在本研究中,我们引入了一种新方法来研究在第四脑室测量的脑脊液流动与皮质BOLD波动之间的耦合。与原始方法相比,使用相位对比磁共振成像测量脑脊液流动提供了定量的流入和流出曲线,并改善了BOLD - CSF耦合指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61e2/11669233/5f3655308344/12987_2024_607_Fig2_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验