Chen Amanda C, Grabowski David C
Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Med Care. 2025 Mar 1;63(3):202-210. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002111. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
To quantify quality of care following an admission to a nursing home with low or high antipsychotic drug use.
Misuse of antipsychotics in U.S. nursing homes is a huge concern for policymakers.
We utilized an instrumental variable approach to estimate the effect of facility-level antipsychotic use on patient outcomes. The instrument was the differential distance to the nearest low-use antipsychotic nursing home relative to the nearest high-use antipsychotic nursing home. Post-acute care short-stay and long-stay residents in U.S. nursing homes were identified using Medicare administrative claims and the Minimum Dataset 3.0 (2014-2019). Outcomes included hospitalizations, falls, pressure ulcers, physical restraint use, medication use, and diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar disease, anxiety, or depression.
Among long-stay residents, receiving care from a low-use facility reduced the diagnosis of schizophrenia, use of restraints, and hospitalizations. There was also a reduction in the hospitalization rate [-0.9 percentage point (pp)], likelihood of long-stay status (-1.8 pp), and diagnosis of schizophrenia (-0.2 pp) at 90 days among short-stay residents. We also observed larger reductions among residents with dementia and serious mental illness.
Admission to a nursing home with a low use of antipsychotics led to decreased hospitalizations, restraint use, and diagnosis of schizophrenia. Curbing the high use of antipsychotics remains a priority of policymakers as the centers for medicare and medicaid services conducts off-site audits to assess whether nursing homes accurately code residents with schizophrenia. It will be important to monitor if centers for medicare and medicaid services downgrades any quality star ratings due to inappropriate coding and assess the implications on quality of care.
量化入住抗精神病药物使用量低或高的疗养院后的护理质量。
美国疗养院中抗精神病药物的滥用是政策制定者极为关注的问题。
我们采用工具变量法来估计疗养院层面抗精神病药物使用对患者结局的影响。该工具是相对于最近的高抗精神病药物使用疗养院,到最近的低抗精神病药物使用疗养院的差异距离。利用医疗保险行政索赔和最低数据集3.0(2014 - 2019年)确定美国疗养院中的急性后短期和长期护理居民。结局包括住院、跌倒、压疮、身体约束使用、药物使用以及精神分裂症、双相情感障碍、焦虑或抑郁的诊断。
在长期护理居民中,接受低使用量疗养院的护理可减少精神分裂症的诊断、约束的使用和住院次数。短期护理居民在90天时的住院率也降低了[-0.9个百分点(pp)],长期护理状态的可能性降低了(-1.8 pp),精神分裂症的诊断降低了(-0.2 pp)。我们还观察到痴呆症和严重精神疾病患者的减少幅度更大。
入住抗精神病药物使用量低的疗养院可减少住院、约束使用和精神分裂症的诊断。随着医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心进行场外审计以评估疗养院是否准确对精神分裂症患者进行编码,遏制抗精神病药物的高使用量仍然是政策制定者的首要任务。监测医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心是否因不当编码而下调任何质量星级评级并评估对护理质量的影响将很重要。