Wang Yuqin, Song Xiuxiu, Wang Siqi, Bai Ting, Li Rui, Liu Haonan, Liu Yuping, Han Zhengxiang
Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China.
Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China.
J Pain Res. 2024 Dec 27;17:4541-4559. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S494243. eCollection 2024.
To develop and summarize pain management strategies after hepatectomy for liver cancer based on the best evidence summary, and to improve the strategy of the Delphi study.
According to the "6S" evidence pyramid model, the database was systematically searched, with a search deadline of December 2023. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening and quality evaluation. Relevant evidence on pain management was extracted and integrated. Relevant evidence for pain management formed a preliminary strategy through a one-day, face-to-face meeting. Subsequently, a Delphi process was performed to improve the strategy. The scientific soundness of the Delphi method was expressed by the effective response rate, authority coefficient (Cr), and coordination coefficient. The coordination of expert opinions was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV) and Kendall's coefficient (W). Cr should be above 0.700 and the coefficient of variation (CV) should be below 0.25. Data analysis was performed using SPSS V.25.0.
A total of 14 studies were included, and we summarized 13 first-level items and 48 second-level items by two rounds of Delphi. The effective response rate of the two rounds of Delphi was 100.00%, and the authority coefficient of the experts was 0.832. The coefficients of variation were 0.00-0.41 and 0.05-0.17, respectively. The Kendall's W values for the two rounds were 0.114-0.222 (p<0.05).
Pain management strategy after hepatectomy is scientific and applicable. We plan to translate this into a plan and confirm its feasibility in the future.
基于最佳证据总结制定并汇总肝癌肝切除术后疼痛管理策略,完善德尔菲研究策略。
依据“6S”证据金字塔模型,系统检索数据库,检索截止日期为2023年12月。两名研究人员独立进行文献筛选和质量评估。提取并整合疼痛管理的相关证据。通过为期一天的面对面会议,疼痛管理的相关证据形成初步策略。随后,进行德尔菲法以完善该策略。德尔菲法的科学性通过有效回复率、权威系数(Cr)和协调系数来体现。使用变异系数(CV)和肯德尔系数(W)评估专家意见的协调性。Cr应高于0.700,变异系数(CV)应低于0.25。使用SPSS V.25.0进行数据分析。
共纳入14项研究,通过两轮德尔菲法汇总出13项一级条目和48项二级条目。两轮德尔菲法的有效回复率均为100.00%,专家权威系数为0.832。变异系数分别为0.00 - 0.41和0.05 - 0.17。两轮的肯德尔W值为0.114 - 0.222(p<0.05)。
肝切除术后疼痛管理策略科学且适用。我们计划将其转化为方案并在未来确认其可行性。