D'Cruz Rebecca F, Rossel Anne, Kaltsakas Georgios, Suh Eui-Sik, Douiri Abdel, Rose Louise, Murphy Patrick B, Hart Nicholas
Lane Fox Clinical Respiratory Physiology Research Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2025 Jan 6;12(1):e002698. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002698.
Patients recovering from severe acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) have a 30-day readmission rate of 20%. This study evaluated the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial to evaluate clinical, patient-reported and physiological effects of home high-flow therapy (HFT) in addition to usual medical therapy, in eucapnic patients recovering from AECOPD to support the design of a phase 3 trial.
A mixed-methods feasibility randomised controlled trial (quantitative primacy, concurrently embedded qualitative evaluation) (ISRCTN15949009) recruiting consecutive non-obese patients hospitalised with AECOPD not requiring acute non-invasive ventilation. Participants were randomised to receive usual care or usual care and home HFT (37°C, 30 L/min) with weekly home-based follow-up for 4 weeks to collect data on: device usage, breathlessness (modified Borg scale, visual analogue scale, Multidimensional Dyspnoea Profile), health-related quality of life (COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Clinical COPD Questionnaire), pulse oximetry, spirometry and inspiratory capacity, parasternal electromyography and actigraphy. Semistructured interviews were conducted in week 4. Trial progression criteria were: ≥40% of eligible patients randomised, ≤20% attrition, ≥70% complete data, and no device-related serious adverse events (SAE).
18 of 45 eligible patients were randomised (age 69±5 years, 44% female, body mass index 23±5 kg/m, forced expiratory volume in 1 second 32±12%). One withdrew following non-respiratory hospitalisation. Complete outcome measures were collected in >90% of home assessments. There were no device-related SAE. Daily HFT usage was 2.7±2.2 hours in week 1, falling to 2.3±1.4 hours by week 4. Temperature and flow settings were modified for comfort in 6 cases. Higher HFT usage was associated with lower symptom burden (CAT p=0.01). Interviews highlighted ease of device use, reduced salbutamol usage, and improved sputum production and clearance.
The data from this feasibility study support the progression to a phase 3 randomised clinical trial investigating the effect of home (HFT) on admission-free survival in COPD patients recovering from a severe exacerbation.
The study received ethical approval (REC19/LO/0194) and was prospectively registered (ISRCTN15949009).
慢性阻塞性肺疾病严重急性加重(AECOPD)康复患者的30天再入院率为20%。本研究评估了开展一项随机对照试验的可行性,该试验旨在评估在常规药物治疗基础上,家庭高流量治疗(HFT)对从AECOPD康复的稳定期患者的临床、患者报告结局及生理影响,以为三期试验设计提供支持。
一项混合方法可行性随机对照试验(以定量为主,同时进行嵌入式定性评估)(ISRCTN15949009),纳入因AECOPD住院且不需要急性无创通气的连续非肥胖患者。参与者被随机分配接受常规护理或常规护理加家庭HFT(37°C,30L/min),并进行为期4周的每周一次家庭随访,以收集以下数据:设备使用情况、呼吸困难(改良Borg量表、视觉模拟量表、多维呼吸困难量表)、健康相关生活质量(慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试(CAT)、临床慢性阻塞性肺疾病问卷)、脉搏血氧饱和度、肺功能测定和吸气能力、胸骨旁肌电图和活动记录仪。在第4周进行半结构化访谈。试验进展标准为:≥40%的符合条件患者被随机分组、≤20%的失访率、≥70%的完整数据,且无与设备相关的严重不良事件(SAE)。
45名符合条件的患者中有18名被随机分组(年龄69±5岁,44%为女性,体重指数23±5kg/m²,第1秒用力呼气量32±12%)。1名患者因非呼吸相关住院而退出。超过90%的家庭评估收集到了完整的结局指标。没有与设备相关的严重不良事件。第1周HFT的每日使用时间为2.7±2.2小时,到第4周降至2.3±1.4小时。6例患者因舒适度原因调整了温度和流量设置。较高的HFT使用量与较低的症状负担相关(CAT p=0.01)。访谈强调了设备使用方便、沙丁胺醇使用减少以及痰液产生和清除改善。
这项可行性研究的数据支持开展三期随机临床试验,以研究家庭HFT对从严重加重期康复的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者无再入院生存期的影响。
本研究获得伦理批准(REC19/LO/0194)并进行了前瞻性注册(ISRCTN15949009)。