Jiang Jijin, Chen Yan, Su Yue, Zhang Li, Qian Hao, Song Xinmiao, Xu Jin-Fu
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Institute of Respiratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Front Immunol. 2024 Dec 23;15:1480542. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1480542. eCollection 2024.
Sepsis is an uncontrolled reaction to infection that causes severe organ dysfunction and is a primary cause of ARDS. Patients suffering both sepsis and ARDS have a poor prognosis and high mortality. However, the mechanisms behind their simultaneous occurrence are unclear.
We acquired sepsis and ARDS datasets from GEO and Arrayexpress databases and screened hub genes by WGCNA and machine learning algorithm. For diagnosis and prognosis, ROC curve and survival analysis were used. We performed GO, KEGG, GSEA, immune cell infiltration, drug prediction, molecular docking, transcription factor prediction, and constructed PPI and ceRNA networks to explore these genes and the common mechanisms of sepsis and ARDS. Single-cell data analysis compared immune cell profiles and hub gene localization. Finally, RT-qPCR and H&E staining confirmed the reliability of hub genes using PBMCs samples and mouse models.
We identified 242 common differentially expressed genes in sepsis and ARDS. WGCNA analysis showed that the turquoise module in GSE95233 is strongly linked to sepsis occurrence and poor prognosis, while the black module in GSE10474 is associated with ARDS. Using WGCNA and three machine learning methods (LASSO, random forest and Boruta), we identified three key genes CX3CR1, PID1 and PTGDS. Models built with them showed high AUC values in ROC curve evaluations and were validated by external datasets, accurately predicting the occurrence and mortality. We further explored the immunological landscape of these genes using immune infiltration and single-cell analysis. Then, the ceRNA, predicted drugs and molecular docking were analyzed. Ultimately, we demonstrated that these genes are expressed differently in human and mouse samples with sepsis and ARDS.
This study identified three molecular signatures (CX3CR1, PID1 and PTGDS) linked to the diagnosis and poor prognosis of sepsis and ARDS, validated by RT-qPCR and H&E staining in both patient and mouse samples. This research may be valuable for identifying shared biological mechanisms and potential treatment targets for both diseases.
脓毒症是对感染的一种失控反应,可导致严重器官功能障碍,是急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的主要病因。同时患有脓毒症和ARDS的患者预后较差,死亡率较高。然而,两者同时发生的背后机制尚不清楚。
我们从基因表达综合数据库(GEO)和Arrayexpress数据库获取脓毒症和ARDS数据集,并通过加权基因共表达网络分析(WGCNA)和机器学习算法筛选枢纽基因。对于诊断和预后,使用ROC曲线和生存分析。我们进行了基因本体论(GO)、京都基因与基因组百科全书(KEGG)、基因集富集分析(GSEA)、免疫细胞浸润、药物预测、分子对接、转录因子预测,并构建了蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用(PPI)和竞争性内源性RNA(ceRNA)网络,以探索这些基因以及脓毒症和ARDS的共同机制。单细胞数据分析比较了免疫细胞图谱和枢纽基因定位。最后,逆转录定量聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)和苏木精-伊红(H&E)染色使用外周血单核细胞(PBMC)样本和小鼠模型证实了枢纽基因的可靠性。
我们在脓毒症和ARDS中鉴定出242个共同的差异表达基因。WGCNA分析表明,GSE95233中的绿松石模块与脓毒症的发生和不良预后密切相关,而GSE10474中的黑色模块与ARDS相关。使用WGCNA和三种机器学习方法(套索回归、随机森林和博鲁塔算法),我们鉴定出三个关键基因:CX3CR1、PID1和PTGDS。用它们构建的模型在ROC曲线评估中显示出高AUC值,并通过外部数据集进行了验证,准确预测了疾病的发生和死亡率。我们使用免疫浸润和单细胞分析进一步探索了这些基因的免疫格局。然后,对ceRNA、预测药物和分子对接进行了分析。最终,我们证明这些基因在患有脓毒症和ARDS的人类和小鼠样本中表达不同。
本研究鉴定出与脓毒症和ARDS的诊断及不良预后相关的三个分子标志物(CX3CR1、PID1和PTGDS);在患者和小鼠样本中,RT-qPCR和H&E染色证实了它们的可靠性。本研究对于确定这两种疾病的共同生物学机制和潜在治疗靶点可能具有重要价值。