Vasankari Ville, Garcia Sergio, Baric Hrvoje, Niemelä Mika, Lehecka Martin
Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 266, FI- 00029, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2025 Jan 8;167(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06419-x.
Digital 3D exoscopes are promising tools for microneurosurgery. The results of exoscope-assisted resection of intracranial meningiomas have only been addressed in few case reports. We retrospectively compared the results of exoscope and microscope-assisted surgery of falx and parasagittal meningiomas.
We included all consecutive adult patients (n = 36) with falx or parasagittal meningioma who were operated with curative intention during an 8-year period by one senior neurosurgeon. The operations were performed either with a surgical microscope (n = 16; Zeiss Kinevo or Pentero 900) or a digital 3D exoscope (n = 20, Aesculap Aeos). We reviewed the pre- and postoperative radiological images, clinical examinations and surgical reports to assess clinical outcomes and complications. We also analyzed surgical videos.
Gross-total resection (Simpson grade I-II) was achieved in approximately 90% of the patients in both groups (89% in exoscope and 92% in microscope group). The duration of the operation was slightly longer (117 vs. 88 min) in the exoscope group. Surgical outcomes were comparable, despite there being larger tumors (median diameter 53 vs. 38 mm) with higher grades (WHO Grade 2-3: 45% vs. 19%) in the exoscope group. Transient postoperative complications were more frequent in the exoscope group (40 vs. 25%) mainly related to the larger tumor size.
The digital 3D exoscope is an effective tool for performing surgery on falx and parasagittal meningiomas. The extent of removal, clinical results and complications seem to be comparable to surgical microscope even in large tumors. Larger prospective studies are required to confirm this result.
数字3D外视镜是显微神经外科手术中很有前景的工具。外视镜辅助切除颅内脑膜瘤的结果仅在少数病例报告中有所有所提及。我们回顾性比较了外视镜和显微镜辅助手术治疗镰旁和矢状窦旁脑膜瘤的结果。
我们纳入了在8年期间由一位资深神经外科医生以根治性意图进行手术的所有连续性成年镰旁或矢状窦旁脑膜瘤患者(n = 36)。手术使用手术显微镜(n = 16;蔡司Kinevo或百多力Pentero 900)或数字3D外视镜(n = 20,蛇牌Aeos)进行。我们回顾术前和术后的影像学图像、临床检查和手术报告,以评估临床结果和并发症。我们还分析了手术视频。
两组中约90%的患者实现了全切除(辛普森分级I-II级)(外视镜组为89%,显微镜组为92%)。外视镜组的手术时间略长(117分钟对88分钟)。尽管外视镜组的肿瘤更大(中位直径53对38毫米)且分级更高(世界卫生组织2-3级:45%对19%),但手术结果相当。外视镜组术后短暂并发症更常见(40%对25%),主要与肿瘤体积较大有关。
数字3D外视镜是用于镰旁和矢状窦旁脑膜瘤手术的有效工具。即使在大肿瘤中,切除范围、临床结果和并发症似乎与手术显微镜相当。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来证实这一结果。