Suppr超能文献

证据的细微差别:黑色素瘤相关随机对照试验中皮肤颜色报告的综述

Shades of evidence: a review of skin color reporting in melanoma-related randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Curtis Deven P, Salmen Natasha L, Baumann Anthony N, Busby Justine F, Brodell Robert T

机构信息

College of Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, 4209 OH-44, OH, 44272, Rootstown, USA.

University of Mississippi Medical Center, Mississippi and JV "Sonny" Montgomery Veterans Hospital, Jackson, MS, USA.

出版信息

Arch Dermatol Res. 2025 Jan 16;317(1):262. doi: 10.1007/s00403-025-03793-z.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the rate of skin color reporting in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving melanoma in the top ten highest dermatology journals by impact factor over the past four decades.

METHODS

A systematic review of RCTs involving melanoma within the top ten dermatology journals, as determined by impact factor, was conducted from inception to July 10th, 2023. Studies were included if they reviewed the diagnosis and/or treatment of melanoma, were RCTs, directly involved patients and were written in English. Studies were characterized as positive for reporting skin of color (SOC) if the demographic data in the results or methods sections included any of the following: race, ethnicity, skin of color, Fitzpatrick scale, sunburn tendency, phototype, skin type, or skin tone.

RESULTS

Out of 76 studies initially identified, only 49 articles met inclusion criteria. Of these 49 articles, only 24 articles recorded data of skin color from their demographics (49%). Subgroup analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the rate of reporting between studies grouped by decade (p = 0.779) or by study location (p = 0.763).

CONCLUSION

Darker skin tones can disguise melanotic skin lesions. Less than 50% of RCTs related to melanoma in the top ten international dermatology journals included skin color within their results section to characterize study participants. This has a negative impact on our understanding of this potentially devastating disease.

摘要

目的

通过影响因子,考察过去四十年来在排名前十的顶级皮肤病学杂志中涉及黑色素瘤的随机对照试验(RCT)中皮肤颜色报告的比例。

方法

对根据影响因子确定的前十种皮肤病学杂志中涉及黑色素瘤的RCT进行系统回顾,时间跨度从创刊至2023年7月10日。纳入的研究需满足以下条件:回顾黑色素瘤的诊断和/或治疗、为RCT、直接涉及患者且以英文撰写。如果结果或方法部分的人口统计学数据包含以下任何一项,则该研究被判定为皮肤颜色(SOC)报告呈阳性:种族、民族、肤色、菲茨帕特里克量表、晒伤倾向、光类型、皮肤类型或肤色。

结果

在最初确定的76项研究中,只有49篇文章符合纳入标准。在这49篇文章中,只有24篇文章记录了其人口统计学中的皮肤颜色数据(49%)。亚组分析显示,按十年分组的研究之间(p = 0.779)或按研究地点分组的研究之间(p = 0.763)报告率无统计学显著差异。

结论

较深的肤色可能会掩盖黑色素性皮肤病变。在前十种国际皮肤病学杂志中,不到50%的与黑色素瘤相关的RCT在其结果部分纳入了皮肤颜色以描述研究参与者。这对我们对这种潜在毁灭性疾病的理解产生了负面影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d0c/11739269/a2a510b69230/403_2025_3793_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验