Bergen Diana D Van, Henseler Tove
Department of Pedagogical and Educational Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Dec 23;8:100285. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100285. eCollection 2025 Jun.
In the field suicide prevention, knowledge about the involvement and approaches of peer specialists is scarce, prompting an examination of their potential unique contributions compared to what mental health nurses offer.
We compared perspectives of peer specialists, mental health nurses, and patients with suicidal thoughts) on: 1) 'causes' of suicidality, 2) essential skills, insights, and interactions in working with patients who feel suicidal; and 3) beneficial approaches for reducing suicidality.
Qualitative interviews with three types of informants were analysed thematically using the Constant Comparative Method. The samples, all from the Netherlands, consisted of 19 peer specialists with a history of suicidality, 18 mental health care nurses, and seven patients with suicidality who had been in contact with both peer specialists and mental health nurses.
All three groups viewed suicidality as a prolonged process driven by problematic situations and thoughts, primarily to escape life rather than die. All groups found the following important: suicide literacy (i.e., knowing what it means to be suicidal and what is optimal suicide care), empathy, and understanding. Patients, however, felt peer specialists showed greater unconditional empathy than nurses, likely because nurses focused on risk assessment and safety. Patients also found peer specialists more convincing in promoting recovery from suicidality than nurses, with their lived experiences serving as powerful examples.
Both mental health care nurses and peer specialists articulated suicide literacy and understood the relevance of empathy and genuine listening in caring for patients who feel suicidal. Nevertheless, in practice, nurses are less often experienced as empathic by patients and do not always abide by shared decision making (due to prioritising risk- and safety assessment). Through their own previous suicidal crises, peer specialists are unique in their ability to break down hierarchical barriers with authentic empathetic support.
在自杀预防领域,关于同伴专家的参与情况和方法的知识稀缺,这促使人们审视他们与心理健康护士相比可能做出的独特贡献。
我们比较了同伴专家、心理健康护士和有自杀想法的患者在以下方面的观点:1)自杀倾向的“原因”;2)与有自杀倾向的患者合作时的基本技能、见解和互动;3)减少自杀倾向的有益方法。
采用持续比较法对三类信息提供者进行定性访谈,并进行主题分析。所有样本均来自荷兰,包括19名有自杀史的同伴专家、18名精神卫生护理人员以及7名曾与同伴专家和精神卫生护理人员接触过的有自杀倾向的患者。
所有三组人员都认为自杀倾向是一个由问题情境和想法驱动的长期过程,主要是为了逃避生活而非死亡。所有组都认为以下几点很重要:自杀知识素养(即了解自杀意味着什么以及最佳的自杀护理是什么)、同理心和理解。然而,患者认为同伴专家比护士表现出更强的无条件同理心,可能是因为护士更关注风险评估和安全。患者还发现同伴专家在促进从自杀倾向中康复方面比护士更有说服力,他们的亲身经历是有力的例证。
精神卫生护理人员和同伴专家都阐述了自杀知识素养,并理解在照顾有自杀倾向的患者时同理心和真诚倾听的重要性。然而,在实践中,患者较少体验到护士具有同理心,而且护士并不总是遵循共同决策(因为优先考虑风险和安全评估)。通过自身之前的自杀危机,同伴专家能够以真诚的同理心支持打破等级障碍,这一点独具特色。