Premji Stephanie, Begum Momtaz, Laila Kishower
School of Labour Studies, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
New Solut. 2025 May;35(1):9-21. doi: 10.1177/10482911241312387. Epub 2025 Jan 26.
Employers sometimes hinder the appropriate reporting of claims to workers' compensation, a phenomenon termed claim suppression. While the magnitude of claim suppression is difficult to quantify, various reports have identified it as a significant concern. In response, several Canadian jurisdictions, such as Ontario in 2015, introduced legislation addressing claim suppression. This article first discusses the legislative and policy context that influences claim suppression in Ontario, including concerns concerning the scope, interpretation, and enforcement of the law. It then presents qualitative findings from a community-based study with members of the Toronto Bangladeshi immigrant community that documented varied forms of employer claim suppression in precarious work, as well as facilitators of claim suppression within the workers' compensation and health care systems. Our findings and those of other research suggest that the scope of claim suppression is broader than that contemplated by the legislation. Our article proposes recommendations for the conceptualization of claim suppression and for legislation, policies, practices, and interventions that are grounded in workers' lived experiences.
雇主有时会阻碍向工人赔偿机构进行适当的索赔申报,这种现象被称为索赔压制。虽然索赔压制的程度难以量化,但各种报告已将其确定为一个重大问题。作为回应,加拿大的几个司法管辖区,比如2015年的安大略省,出台了针对索赔压制的立法。本文首先讨论影响安大略省索赔压制的立法和政策背景,包括对法律范围、解释和执行的担忧。然后介绍了一项基于社区的研究的定性结果,该研究的对象是多伦多孟加拉移民社区的成员,记录了不稳定工作中雇主索赔压制的各种形式,以及工人赔偿和医疗保健系统中索赔压制的促成因素。我们的研究结果以及其他研究的结果表明,索赔压制的范围比立法所设想的更广。我们的文章针对索赔压制的概念化以及基于工人实际生活经历的立法、政策、实践和干预措施提出了建议。