Sima Stone, Diwan Ashish
Spine Labs St George and Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales Kogarah New South Wales Australia.
Spine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery St George and Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales Kogarah New South Wales Australia.
JOR Spine. 2025 Jan 23;8(1):e70021. doi: 10.1002/jsp2.70021. eCollection 2025 Mar.
Pain of a chronic nature remains the foremost concern in tertiary spine clinics, yet its elusive nature and quantification challenges persist. Despite extensive research and education on low back pain (LBP), the realm of diagnostic practices lacks a unified approach. Clinically, LBP exhibits a multifaceted character, encompassing conventional assessments of severity and disability, alongside nuanced attributes like pain characterization, duration, and patient expectations. Common instigators of LBP encountered in spine surgical settings comprise degenerated intervertebral discs (IVD), herniated IVD, canal and foraminal stenosis, and spondylolisthesis. However, addressing the root cause necessitates its identification and substantiation through visualization.
This perspective reviews the diagnostic complexities of LBP. Thorough history-taking and physical examinations offer preliminary insights into the underlying source of pain, whether it arises from discogenic origins, neural compression, or sagittal imbalance. The importance of classifying chronic LBP into the underlying pathophysiology is explored. Emphasis is placed on the necessity of aligning clinical observations with imaging findings to guide personalized treatment strategies.
Currently, there exists a disparity globally between evidence-based recommendations and actual applications. Recent discoveries behind the pathophysiology of pain phenotypes signify the importance of classifying LBP into its neuropathic or nociceptive origins. The pivotal role of radiological investigations in validating clinical findings for an accurate diagnosis cannot be overstated. However, radiology should not operate in isolation; the disconnect between the clinical and radiological realms ultimately benefits neither the patient nor the surgeon. Additionally, more sensitive measures of IVD prolapse and the corresponding inflammatory pathway triggered are required to provide information on the underlying pathophysiological mechanism of pain generation.
This perspective article underscores the imperative fusion of clinical acumen and radiological precision in the intricate landscape of LBP diagnosis. These findings advocate for a paradigm shift towards personalized medicine. By offering a compass for surgeons to navigate this complex terrain and deliver more effective, patient-centered care with targeted interventions this article aims to enhance management outcomes for chronic LBP.
慢性疼痛仍是三级脊柱诊所最主要的关注点,但其难以捉摸的特性以及量化挑战依然存在。尽管对腰痛(LBP)进行了广泛研究和教育,但诊断实践领域仍缺乏统一的方法。在临床上,LBP具有多方面的特点,包括对严重程度和残疾程度的常规评估,以及疼痛特征、持续时间和患者期望等细微特征。脊柱手术中常见的LBP诱发因素包括退变的椎间盘(IVD)、椎间盘突出、椎管和椎间孔狭窄以及椎体滑脱。然而,要解决根本原因,就需要通过可视化来识别和证实它。
本观点综述了LBP的诊断复杂性。全面的病史采集和体格检查可初步洞察疼痛的潜在来源,无论其源于椎间盘源性、神经受压还是矢状面失衡。探讨了将慢性LBP根据潜在病理生理学进行分类的重要性。强调了将临床观察结果与影像学发现相结合以指导个性化治疗策略的必要性。
目前,全球范围内基于证据的建议与实际应用之间存在差距。疼痛表型病理生理学背后的最新发现表明将LBP根据其神经病理性或伤害感受性起源进行分类的重要性。放射学检查在验证临床发现以进行准确诊断方面的关键作用再怎么强调也不为过。然而,放射学不应孤立进行;临床和放射学领域之间的脱节最终对患者和外科医生都没有好处。此外,需要更敏感的IVD脱垂测量方法以及所触发的相应炎症途径,以提供有关疼痛产生潜在病理生理机制的信息。
这篇观点文章强调了在LBP诊断的复杂领域中临床敏锐度与放射学精准度的迫切融合。这些发现倡导向个性化医疗的范式转变。通过为外科医生提供指引,使其在这个复杂领域中导航,并通过有针对性的干预提供更有效、以患者为中心的护理,本文旨在提高慢性LBP的管理效果。