Moya Fernando, Fowler Jennifer, Florens Adrian, Dombrowski Jennifer, Davis Olivia, Blanks Tiffony, Gratton Austin
Betty Cameron Children's Hospital and University of North Carolina Medical School, Wilmington, North Carolina.
East Carolina University Health Medical Center, Greenville, North Carolina.
Am J Perinatol. 2025 Oct;42(13):1729-1737. doi: 10.1055/a-2527-4638. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
This study aimed to compare growth outcomes and tolerance among very low birth weight (VLBW) infants receiving a new, liquid human milk fortifier (LHMF-NEW) or a human milk fortifier-acidified liquid (HMF-AL).Retrospective, multicenter study of 515 VLBW infants in three regional neonatal intensive care units. The primary objective was to compare growth velocity (g/kg/d) during fortification between groups by repeated measures regression. Secondary outcomes of interest were feeding tolerance and the incidence of late-onset sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, and metabolic acidosis. Student's , analysis of variance, Wilcoxon, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for numeric variables, or chi-squared and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables.No demographic differences were identified between the groups (HMF-AL, = 242; LHMF-NEW, = 273). Growth velocity during fortification was significantly higher in the group receiving LHMF-NEW, despite relatively similar total fluid, calorie, or protein intake ( = 0.001). Feeding intolerance was comparable between fortifiers. Necrotizing enterocolitis and late-onset sepsis did not differ between groups and metabolic acidosis was diagnosed less frequently with the LHMF-NEW. Anthropometric measures at discharge and length of stay were comparable.Infants receiving human milk fortified with the LHMF-NEW had faster growth velocity during fortification, similar tolerance, and less metabolic acidosis compared with an earlier cohort of infants who received human milk fortified with an HMF-AL. · Among VLBW infants, using an LHMF-NEW resulted in a faster growth velocity in weight during several weeks of fortification than using the previous HMF-AL.. · The incidence of feeding intolerance (stopping feeds >8 hour) in any given week of fortification was low and not different between groups. Also, late-onset sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis were uncommon with no differences between groups, whereas the incidence of metabolic acidosis was lower in infants receiving the LHMF-NEW.. · No differences in length of stay or anthropometrics at discharge were identified..
本研究旨在比较接受新型液态人乳强化剂(LHMF-NEW)或人乳强化剂酸化液(HMF-AL)的极低出生体重(VLBW)婴儿的生长结局和耐受性。对三个地区新生儿重症监护病房的515例VLBW婴儿进行回顾性多中心研究。主要目的是通过重复测量回归比较两组强化喂养期间的生长速度(g/kg/d)。感兴趣的次要结局是喂养耐受性以及晚发性败血症、坏死性小肠结肠炎和代谢性酸中毒的发生率。数值变量采用学生t检验、方差分析、Wilcoxon检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验,分类变量采用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验。两组之间未发现人口统计学差异(HMF-AL组,n = 242;LHMF-NEW组,n = 273)。尽管总液体、热量或蛋白质摄入量相对相似,但接受LHMF-NEW组强化喂养期间的生长速度显著更高(P = 0.001)。两种强化剂之间的喂养不耐受情况相当。两组之间坏死性小肠结肠炎和晚发性败血症无差异,LHMF-NEW组代谢性酸中毒的诊断频率较低。出院时的人体测量指标和住院时间相当。与早期接受HMF-AL强化人乳喂养的婴儿队列相比,接受LHMF-NEW强化人乳喂养的婴儿在强化喂养期间生长速度更快,耐受性相似,代谢性酸中毒更少。· 在VLBW婴儿中,使用LHMF-NEW在强化喂养的几周内体重生长速度比使用先前的HMF-AL更快。· 在任何给定的强化喂养周中,喂养不耐受(停止喂养>8小时)的发生率较低,且两组之间无差异。此外,晚发性败血症和坏死性小肠结肠炎不常见,两组之间无差异,而接受LHMF-NEW的婴儿代谢性酸中毒的发生率较低。· 未发现住院时间或出院时人体测量指标存在差异。