Bang Nina, Pettersen Johanne H, Nesset Merete Berg, Rasmussen Kirsten, Dahl Hilde, Tesli Natalia, Bell Christina, Vaskinn Anja, Fischer-Vieler Thomas, Friestad Christine, Andreassen Ole A, Jönsson Erik G, Elvsåshagen Torbjørn, Haukvik Unn K, Moberget Torgeir
Centre for Research and Education in Forensic Psychiatry Security, St. Olavs Hospital, 7440 Trondheim, Norway.
Department of Mental Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Schizophr Bull Open. 2024 Dec 28;6(1):sgae031. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgae031. eCollection 2025 Jan.
There is a pressing need for biomarkers of violent behavior risk in psychosis. Previous research indicates that electrophysiological measures of automatic defensive reactions may have potential. The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between violent behavior in individuals with and without psychosis and electromyography (EMG) and electroencephalography (EEG) responses to startling auditory stimuli. Electromyography and EEG were recorded during an auditory startle paradigm from healthy controls (HC, = 211), individuals with psychosis and a history of violent behavior (violent-PSY, = 18), individuals with psychosis without a history of violence (nonviolent-PSY, = 32), and individuals with a history of violence without psychosis (violent non-PSY, = 22). We estimated the auditory startle response (ASR) and prepulse inhibition (PPI) using EMG (ie, EMG and EMG) and the auditory-evoked potential (ie, AEP and AEP) of the EEG. There were no significant effects of group on the EMG ( = .10) or the 30-, 60-, and 120-ms prepulse + pulse EMG amplitudes ( = .11, = .19, and = .50, respectively). The N1 amplitude of the AEP was reduced in the violent-PSY group ( < .001) and the nonviolent-PSY group ( = .015) compared with HC. The P2 amplitude of the AEP was reduced in violent-PSY relative to nonviolent-PSY ( = .003), violent non-PSY ( = .016), and HC ( < .001). Together, these results show that EEG-based neural responses to startling auditory stimuli are promising biomarkers of violence risk in psychosis.
精神病患者暴力行为风险的生物标志物存在迫切需求。先前的研究表明,自动防御反应的电生理测量可能具有潜力。本研究的目的是调查有或无精神病个体的暴力行为与肌电图(EMG)和脑电图(EEG)对惊人听觉刺激的反应之间的关联。在听觉惊吓范式期间,记录了健康对照者(HC,n = 211)、有暴力行为史的精神病患者(暴力-PSY,n = 18)、无暴力史的精神病患者(非暴力-PSY,n = 32)以及无精神病暴力史个体(暴力非-PSY,n = 22)的肌电图和脑电图。我们使用肌电图(即EMG和EMG)以及脑电图的听觉诱发电位(即AEP和AEP)来估计听觉惊吓反应(ASR)和预脉冲抑制(PPI)。组间在肌电图上无显著影响(p = 0.10),在30毫秒、60毫秒和120毫秒的预脉冲+脉冲肌电图振幅上也无显著影响(分别为p = 0.11、p = 0.19和p = 0.50)。与HC相比,暴力-PSY组(p < 0.001)和非暴力-PSY组(p = 0.015)的AEP的N1振幅降低。相对于非暴力-PSY(p = 0.003)、暴力非-PSY(p = 0.016)和HC(p < 0.001),暴力-PSY组的AEP的P2振幅降低。总之,这些结果表明,基于脑电图对惊人听觉刺激的神经反应是精神病患者暴力风险的有前景的生物标志物。