Suppr超能文献

交叉验证(CV)和均值用于两种不同批次的分析物对照对化学诊断测试中韦斯特加德规则实施的影响。

Impact of using cross-over CV and mean for two different lots of assay control on implementation of Westgard rules in chemical diagnostic tests.

作者信息

Nabil Ayman Mohamed, Alsaif Hayat Mirza, Aljamaan Muneer Ahmad, Algafly Abdullah Abdullah H, Aleid Rashad Hassan, Helal Raji Ali, Almutawah Zainab Ali Hussain, Alzayer Amani Abdulkareem S, Almutawah Walaa Ali Hussain, AlKhalaf Badr Abdullah Motlaq

机构信息

Ministry of Health, Unnamed Road, النخيل, الرياض, 12382, Saudi Arabia.

Dammam Regional Laboratory, C3JM+73W, Ghirnatah, Dammam, 32245, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Pract Lab Med. 2025 Jan 16;44:e00449. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2025.e00449. eCollection 2025 Apr.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The main challenges of clinical laboratories concerning quality control include cost-effectiveness, variability in standardized materials, and evolving technologies across various diagnostic fields. While traditional QC practices and automation systems provide for accuracy, gaps exist, especially when applying Westgard rules to control lots for multiple assays. Such gaps result in inconsistent QC outcomes and unaddressed challenges in diagnostic reliability.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the effect of the cross-over coefficient of variation (CV) and mean values for different assay control lots on implementing Westgard rules to improve QC practices and enhance the accuracy and reliability of diagnostic tests in molecular laboratories.

METHODS

Data from 18 Levy-Jennings charts, with two assay control lots, were analyzed. Statistical comparisons of failure rates before and after setting the actual SD were performed using chi-square or T-tests at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The analysis of 18 Levy-Jennings charts showed a significant reduction in failure rates after establishing actual mean and SD values compared to cross-over CV. Of the charts, 11 exhibited differences in failure occurrences, particularly rejection failures, highlighting improved QC reliability.

CONCLUSION

These results emphasize the importance of accurate SD calculation in enhancing the effectiveness of Westgard rules. Therefore, establishing mean and SD values enhances QC reliability, reduces false failures, and ensures accurate Westgard rules application, while ongoing training in QC practices enhances diagnostic accuracy.

摘要

背景

临床实验室在质量控制方面面临的主要挑战包括成本效益、标准化材料的可变性以及各个诊断领域不断发展的技术。虽然传统的质量控制方法和自动化系统能够保证准确性,但仍存在差距,尤其是在将韦斯特加德规则应用于多种检测的控制批次时。这些差距导致质量控制结果不一致,以及诊断可靠性方面未解决的挑战。

目的

本研究旨在评估不同检测控制批次的交叉变异系数(CV)和均值对实施韦斯特加德规则的影响,以改进分子实验室的质量控制方法,提高诊断检测的准确性和可靠性。

方法

分析了来自18个包含两个检测控制批次的利维-詹宁斯图的数据。在设定实际标准差前后,使用卡方检验或t检验对失败率进行统计学比较,p<0.05。

结果

对18个利维-詹宁斯图的分析表明,与交叉CV相比,在建立实际均值和标准差后,失败率显著降低。其中11个图在失败发生率上存在差异,尤其是拒收失败,这突出了质量控制可靠性的提高。

结论

这些结果强调了准确计算标准差对提高韦斯特加德规则有效性的重要性。因此,建立均值和标准差可提高质量控制可靠性,减少错误失败,并确保韦斯特加德规则的准确应用,同时持续的质量控制实践培训可提高诊断准确性。

相似文献

2
Practical application of Sigma Metrics QC procedures in clinical chemistry.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011 Nov;49(11):1837-43. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.249. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
3
A modified quality control protocol for infectious disease serology based on the Westgard rules.
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 19;14(1):16683. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67472-1.
4
Quality control validation for a veterinary laboratory network of six Sysmex XT-2000iV hematology analyzers.
Vet Clin Pathol. 2022 Dec;51(4):565-576. doi: 10.1111/vcp.13163. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
5
QC Constellation: a cutting-edge solution for risk and patient-based quality control in clinical laboratories.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2024 May 31;62(11):2185-2197. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2024-0156. Print 2024 Oct 28.
6
7
Management of Cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr Virus, and HIV Viral Load Quality Control Data Using Unity Real Time.
J Clin Microbiol. 2022 Jan 19;60(1):e0167521. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01675-21. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
8
Levey-Jennings Analysis Uncovers Unsuspected Causes of Immunohistochemistry Stain Variability.
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2016 Nov/Dec;24(10):688-694. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000260.
9
Internal quality control: Moving average algorithms outperform Westgard rules.
Clin Biochem. 2021 Dec;98:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2021.09.007. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
10
Selecting multi-rule quality control procedures based on patient risk.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Oct 26;55(11):1702-1708. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2016-1077.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality standards and internal quality control practices in medical laboratories: an IFCC global survey of member societies.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023 Jun 19;61(12):2094-2101. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2023-0492. Print 2023 Nov 27.
2
Setting process control chart limits for rounded-off measurements.
Heliyon. 2023 Feb 21;9(3):e13655. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13655. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
Directions for Exercise Treatment Response Heterogeneity and Individual Response Research.
Int J Sports Med. 2022 Jan;43(1):11-22. doi: 10.1055/a-1548-7026. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
5
Current and future challenges in quality assurance in molecular diagnostics.
Clin Chim Acta. 2021 Aug;519:239-246. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.05.004. Epub 2021 May 8.
7
A practical guide to validation and verification of analytical methods in the clinical laboratory.
Adv Clin Chem. 2019;90:215-281. doi: 10.1016/bs.acc.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Mar 9.
8
Raincloud plots: a multi-platform tool for robust data visualization.
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Jan 21;4:63. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15191.2. eCollection 2019.
9
Benefits and risks of standardization, harmonization and conformity to opinion in clinical laboratories.
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2019 Aug;56(5):287-306. doi: 10.1080/10408363.2019.1615408. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
10
Laboratory Information System - Where are we Today?
J Med Biochem. 2017 Jul 14;36(3):220-224. doi: 10.1515/jomb-2017-0021. eCollection 2017 Sep.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验