Nabil Ayman Mohamed, Alsaif Hayat Mirza, Aljamaan Muneer Ahmad, Algafly Abdullah Abdullah H, Aleid Rashad Hassan, Helal Raji Ali, Almutawah Zainab Ali Hussain, Alzayer Amani Abdulkareem S, Almutawah Walaa Ali Hussain, AlKhalaf Badr Abdullah Motlaq
Ministry of Health, Unnamed Road, النخيل, الرياض, 12382, Saudi Arabia.
Dammam Regional Laboratory, C3JM+73W, Ghirnatah, Dammam, 32245, Saudi Arabia.
Pract Lab Med. 2025 Jan 16;44:e00449. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2025.e00449. eCollection 2025 Apr.
The main challenges of clinical laboratories concerning quality control include cost-effectiveness, variability in standardized materials, and evolving technologies across various diagnostic fields. While traditional QC practices and automation systems provide for accuracy, gaps exist, especially when applying Westgard rules to control lots for multiple assays. Such gaps result in inconsistent QC outcomes and unaddressed challenges in diagnostic reliability.
This study aims to assess the effect of the cross-over coefficient of variation (CV) and mean values for different assay control lots on implementing Westgard rules to improve QC practices and enhance the accuracy and reliability of diagnostic tests in molecular laboratories.
Data from 18 Levy-Jennings charts, with two assay control lots, were analyzed. Statistical comparisons of failure rates before and after setting the actual SD were performed using chi-square or T-tests at p < 0.05.
The analysis of 18 Levy-Jennings charts showed a significant reduction in failure rates after establishing actual mean and SD values compared to cross-over CV. Of the charts, 11 exhibited differences in failure occurrences, particularly rejection failures, highlighting improved QC reliability.
These results emphasize the importance of accurate SD calculation in enhancing the effectiveness of Westgard rules. Therefore, establishing mean and SD values enhances QC reliability, reduces false failures, and ensures accurate Westgard rules application, while ongoing training in QC practices enhances diagnostic accuracy.
临床实验室在质量控制方面面临的主要挑战包括成本效益、标准化材料的可变性以及各个诊断领域不断发展的技术。虽然传统的质量控制方法和自动化系统能够保证准确性,但仍存在差距,尤其是在将韦斯特加德规则应用于多种检测的控制批次时。这些差距导致质量控制结果不一致,以及诊断可靠性方面未解决的挑战。
本研究旨在评估不同检测控制批次的交叉变异系数(CV)和均值对实施韦斯特加德规则的影响,以改进分子实验室的质量控制方法,提高诊断检测的准确性和可靠性。
分析了来自18个包含两个检测控制批次的利维-詹宁斯图的数据。在设定实际标准差前后,使用卡方检验或t检验对失败率进行统计学比较,p<0.05。
对18个利维-詹宁斯图的分析表明,与交叉CV相比,在建立实际均值和标准差后,失败率显著降低。其中11个图在失败发生率上存在差异,尤其是拒收失败,这突出了质量控制可靠性的提高。
这些结果强调了准确计算标准差对提高韦斯特加德规则有效性的重要性。因此,建立均值和标准差可提高质量控制可靠性,减少错误失败,并确保韦斯特加德规则的准确应用,同时持续的质量控制实践培训可提高诊断准确性。