Olff Miranda, Hein Irma, Amstadter Ananda B, Armour Cherie, Skogbrott Birkeland Marianne, Bui Eric, Cloitre Marylene, Ehlers Anke, Ford Julian D, Greene Talya, Hansen Maj, Harnett Nathaniel G, Kaminer Debra, Lewis Catrin, Minelli Alessandra, Niles Barbara, Nugent Nicole R, Roberts Neil, Price Matthew, Reffi Anthony N, Seedat Soraya, Seligowski Antonia V, Vujanovic Anka A
Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
ARQ National Psychotrauma Centre, Diemen, The Netherlands.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2458406. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2458406. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
To mark 15 years of the European Journal of Psychotraumatology, editors reviewed the past 15-year years of research on trauma exposure and its consequences, as well as developments in (early) psychological, pharmacological and complementary interventions. In all sections of this paper, we provide perspectives on sex/gender aspects, life course trends, and cross-cultural/global and systemic societal contexts. Globally, the majority of people experience stressful events that may be characterized as traumatic. However, definitions of what is traumatic are not necessarily straightforward or universal. Traumatic events may have a wide range of transdiagnostic mental and physical health consequences, not limited to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Research on genetic, molecular, and neurobiological influences show promise for further understanding underlying risk and resilience for trauma-related consequences. Symptom presentation, prevalence, and course, in response to traumatic experiences, differ depending on individuals' age and developmental phase, sex/gender, sociocultural and environmental contexts, and systemic socio-political forces. Early interventions have the potential to prevent acute posttraumatic stress reactions from escalating to a PTSD diagnosis whether delivered in the golden hours or weeks after trauma. However, research on prevention is still scarce compared to treatment research where several evidence-based psychological, pharmacological and complementary/ integrative interventions exist, and novel forms of delivery have become available. Here, we focus on how best to address the range of negative health outcomes following trauma, how to serve individuals across the age spectrum, including the very young and old, and include considerations of sex/gender, ethnicity, and culture in diverse contexts, beyond Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) countries. We conclude with providing directions for future research aimed at improving the well-being of all people impacted by trauma around the world. The provides a 90-minute summary of this paper and can be downloaded here [http://bit.ly/4jdtx6k].
为纪念《欧洲创伤心理学期刊》创刊15周年,编辑们回顾了过去15年中关于创伤暴露及其后果的研究,以及(早期)心理、药物和辅助干预措施的发展情况。在本文的各个部分,我们都提供了关于性别、生命历程趋势以及跨文化/全球和系统性社会背景的观点。在全球范围内,大多数人都会经历可能被视为创伤性的应激事件。然而,关于什么是创伤性事件的定义并不一定简单明了或具有普遍性。创伤性事件可能会产生广泛的跨诊断性身心健康后果,并不局限于创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)。对遗传、分子和神经生物学影响的研究为进一步理解创伤相关后果的潜在风险和恢复力带来了希望。因创伤经历而出现的症状表现、患病率和病程,会因个体的年龄和发育阶段、性别、社会文化和环境背景以及系统性社会政治力量的不同而有所差异。早期干预有可能预防急性创伤后应激反应升级为PTSD诊断,无论这种干预是在创伤后的黄金时段还是几周内进行。然而,与治疗研究相比,预防研究仍然较少,治疗研究中有几种基于证据的心理、药物和辅助/综合干预措施,并且出现了新的治疗形式。在此,我们关注如何最好地应对创伤后的一系列负面健康结果,如何为各个年龄段的人提供服务,包括非常年幼和年长的人,以及如何在西方、受过教育、工业化、富裕和民主(WEIRD)国家以外的不同背景下考虑性别、种族和文化因素。我们最后为未来的研究提供了方向,旨在改善世界各地所有受创伤影响的人们的福祉。[具体网址]提供了本文90分钟的总结,可在此处下载[http://bit.ly/4jdtx6k]。