Janek Michael, Kuhnova Jitka, Cardon Greet, Van Dyck Delfien, Cimler Richard, Elavsky Steriani, Fezeu Leopold K, Oppert Jean-Michel, Buck Christoph, Hebestreit Antje, Harrington Janas, Sigcha Luis, Van de Ven Pepijn, Donnelly Alan, Vetrovsky Tomas
Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Faculty of Science, University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czechia.
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 11;20(2):e0318772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318772. eCollection 2025.
Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) enables the real-time capture of health-related behaviours, their situational contexts, and associated subjective experiences. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of an EMA targeting physical and eating behaviours, optimise its protocol, and provide recommendations for future large-scale EMA data collections. The study involved 52 participants (age 31±9 years, 56% females) from Czechia, France, Germany, and Ireland completing a 9-day free-living EMA protocol using the HealthReact platform connected to a Fitbit tracker. The EMA protocol included time-based (7/day), event-based (up to 10/day), and self-initiated surveys, each containing 8 to 17 items assessing physical and eating behaviours and related contextual factors such as affective states, location, and company. Qualitative insights were gathered from post-EMA feedback interviews. Compliance was low (median 49%), particularly for event-based surveys (median 34%), and declined over time. Many participants were unable or unwilling to complete surveys in certain contexts (e.g., when with family), faced interference with their daily schedules, and encountered occasional technical issues, suggesting the need for thorough initial training, an individualised protocol, and systematic compliance monitoring. The number of event-based surveys was less than desired for the study, with a median of 2.4/day for sedentary events, when 4 were targeted, and 0.9/day for walking events, when 3 were targeted. Conducting simulations using participants' Fitbit data allowed for optimising the triggering rules, achieving the desired median number of sedentary and walking surveys (3.9/day for both) in similar populations. Self-initiated reports of meals and drinks yielded more reports than those prompted in time-based and event-based EMA surveys, suggesting that self-initiated surveys might better reflect actual eating behaviours. This study highlights the importance of assessing feasibility and optimising EMA protocols to enhance subsequent compliance and data quality. Conducting pre-tests to refine protocols and procedures, including simulations using participants' activity data for optimal event-based triggering rules, is crucial for successful large-scale data collection in EMA studies of physical and eating behaviours.
生态瞬时评估(EMA)能够实时捕捉与健康相关的行为、其情境背景以及相关的主观体验。本研究旨在评估针对身体活动和饮食行为的EMA的可行性,优化其方案,并为未来大规模EMA数据收集提供建议。该研究招募了来自捷克、法国、德国和爱尔兰的52名参与者(年龄31±9岁,56%为女性),他们使用与Fitbit追踪器相连的HealthReact平台完成了一项为期9天的自由生活EMA方案。EMA方案包括基于时间的调查(每天7次)、基于事件的调查(每天最多10次)和自主发起的调查,每项调查包含8至17个项目,评估身体活动和饮食行为以及相关的情境因素,如情感状态、地点和陪伴情况。通过EMA后反馈访谈收集了定性见解。依从性较低(中位数为49%),尤其是基于事件的调查(中位数为34%),且随时间下降。许多参与者在某些情况下(如与家人在一起时)无法或不愿意完成调查,面临日常日程安排的干扰,并偶尔遇到技术问题,这表明需要进行全面的初始培训、个性化方案以及系统的依从性监测。基于事件的调查数量低于研究预期,久坐事件的中位数为每天2.4次(目标为4次),步行事件的中位数为每天0.9次(目标为3次)。利用参与者的Fitbit数据进行模拟,有助于优化触发规则,在类似人群中实现久坐和步行调查的预期中位数数量(两者均为每天3.9次)。自主发起的饮食和饮料报告比基于时间和事件的EMA调查中提示的报告更多,这表明自主发起的调查可能更好地反映实际饮食行为。本研究强调了评估可行性和优化EMA方案以提高后续依从性和数据质量的重要性。进行预测试以完善方案和程序,包括利用参与者的活动数据进行模拟以确定最佳的基于事件的触发规则,对于身体活动和饮食行为的EMA研究中成功进行大规模数据收集至关重要。