Simmons Rebecca G, Gero Alexandra, Carter Gentry, Sanders Jessica N, Quade Caitlin, Baayd Jami, Mullholand Madeline, Elliott Sarah, Myers Kyl, Torres Erica, Smith Justin D, Turok David K
Rebecca G. Simmons, Alexandra Gero, Gentry Carter, Jessica N. Sanders, Caitlin Quade, Jami Baayd, Madeline Mullholand, Sarah Elliott, Kyl Myers, Erica Torres, and David K. Turok are with the Division of Family Planning in the School of Medicine at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City. Justin D. Smith is with the Department of Population Health Sciences at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Am J Public Health. 2025 Mar;115(3):387-396. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307917.
To assess contraceptive service changes during the Family Planning Elevated (FPE) Contraceptive Access Program in Utah clinics from 2018 to 2023. We assessed de-identified electronic health record data on female clients aged 18 to 50 years from intervention and matched control sites. We used comparative interrupted time series analyses comparing total number of contraceptive services and their proportion relative to visits between intervention and control sites before, during, and after FPE. Intervention sites provided on average 1.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.17, 2.66) times as many contraceptive services per month as controls during the 24-month intervention period, with no significant decreases in services noted in the postintervention period. The proportions of total visits related to family planning decreased by a factor of 0.70 (95% CI = 0.52, 0.94) during the intervention period. However, this effect was mitigated at intervention sites where proportions of contraceptive services were 1.44 (95% CI = 0.97, 2.14) times greater than control sites and did not significantly decrease after the intervention. Contraceptive access initiatives have capacity to make meaningful change in communities where they are employed, even after they end. (. 2025;115(3):387-396. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307917).
为评估2018年至2023年犹他州诊所的计划生育提升(FPE)避孕服务项目期间避孕服务的变化情况。我们评估了来自干预站点和匹配对照站点的18至50岁女性客户的去识别化电子健康记录数据。我们采用比较中断时间序列分析,比较了FPE之前、期间和之后干预站点和对照站点避孕服务的总数及其相对于就诊次数的比例。在24个月的干预期内,干预站点每月提供的避孕服务平均是对照站点的1.76倍(95%置信区间[CI]=1.17, 2.66),干预后时期未发现服务有显著减少。在干预期内,与计划生育相关的就诊总数比例下降了0.70倍(95% CI=0.52, 0.94)。然而,在干预站点,这种影响得到了缓解,那里避孕服务的比例比对照站点高1.44倍(95% CI=0.97, 2.14),并且在干预后没有显著下降。避孕服务获取倡议即使在结束后,也有能力在其实施的社区带来有意义的改变。(. 2025;115(3):387 - 396. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307917)