Suppr超能文献

犹他州计划生育提升避孕服务可及性倡议期间避孕服务的变化:干预站点与对照站点的前瞻性评估

Changes in Contraceptive Services During Utah's Family Planning Elevated Contraceptive Access Initiative: A Prospective Assessment of Intervention and Control Sites.

作者信息

Simmons Rebecca G, Gero Alexandra, Carter Gentry, Sanders Jessica N, Quade Caitlin, Baayd Jami, Mullholand Madeline, Elliott Sarah, Myers Kyl, Torres Erica, Smith Justin D, Turok David K

机构信息

Rebecca G. Simmons, Alexandra Gero, Gentry Carter, Jessica N. Sanders, Caitlin Quade, Jami Baayd, Madeline Mullholand, Sarah Elliott, Kyl Myers, Erica Torres, and David K. Turok are with the Division of Family Planning in the School of Medicine at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City. Justin D. Smith is with the Department of Population Health Sciences at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2025 Mar;115(3):387-396. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307917.

Abstract

To assess contraceptive service changes during the Family Planning Elevated (FPE) Contraceptive Access Program in Utah clinics from 2018 to 2023. We assessed de-identified electronic health record data on female clients aged 18 to 50 years from intervention and matched control sites. We used comparative interrupted time series analyses comparing total number of contraceptive services and their proportion relative to visits between intervention and control sites before, during, and after FPE. Intervention sites provided on average 1.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.17, 2.66) times as many contraceptive services per month as controls during the 24-month intervention period, with no significant decreases in services noted in the postintervention period. The proportions of total visits related to family planning decreased by a factor of 0.70 (95% CI = 0.52, 0.94) during the intervention period. However, this effect was mitigated at intervention sites where proportions of contraceptive services were 1.44 (95% CI = 0.97, 2.14) times greater than control sites and did not significantly decrease after the intervention. Contraceptive access initiatives have capacity to make meaningful change in communities where they are employed, even after they end. (. 2025;115(3):387-396. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307917).

摘要

为评估2018年至2023年犹他州诊所的计划生育提升(FPE)避孕服务项目期间避孕服务的变化情况。我们评估了来自干预站点和匹配对照站点的18至50岁女性客户的去识别化电子健康记录数据。我们采用比较中断时间序列分析,比较了FPE之前、期间和之后干预站点和对照站点避孕服务的总数及其相对于就诊次数的比例。在24个月的干预期内,干预站点每月提供的避孕服务平均是对照站点的1.76倍(95%置信区间[CI]=1.17, 2.66),干预后时期未发现服务有显著减少。在干预期内,与计划生育相关的就诊总数比例下降了0.70倍(95% CI=0.52, 0.94)。然而,在干预站点,这种影响得到了缓解,那里避孕服务的比例比对照站点高1.44倍(95% CI=0.97, 2.14),并且在干预后没有显著下降。避孕服务获取倡议即使在结束后,也有能力在其实施的社区带来有意义的改变。(. 2025;115(3):387 - 396. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307917)

相似文献

2
Implementation and Monitoring of the Family Planning Elevated Contraceptive Access Program, Utah, 2018‒2019.
Am J Public Health. 2022 Jun;112(S5):S528-S531. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306935.
5
Contraceptive Method Use During the Community-Wide HER Salt Lake Contraceptive Initiative.
Am J Public Health. 2018 Apr;108(4):550-556. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304299. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
6
The effect of a no-cost contraceptive initiative on method selection by women with housing insecurity.
Contraception. 2020 Mar;101(3):205-209. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.11.003. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
8
Contraceptive services for teenagers: do we need family planning clinics?
BMJ. 1995 Jun 24;310(6995):1641-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6995.1641.
9
Family planning clinic services in the United States, 1994.
Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 May-Jun;28(3):92-100.

本文引用的文献

1
Contraceptive Method Use Among a Population-Based Cohort During the South Carolina Choose Well Initiative.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e248262. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.8262.
2
Estimates of use of preferred contraceptive method in the United States: a population-based study.
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Jan 19;30:100662. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100662. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Same-day long-acting reversible contraceptive utilization after a statewide contraceptive access initiative.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Apr;228(4):451.e1-451.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.12.304. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
5
Facility-based simulation as a programmatic tool for implementing a statewide contraceptive initiative.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 29;22(1):965. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08332-4.
6
Reproductive Well-Being: A Framework for Expanding Contraceptive Access.
Am J Public Health. 2022 Jun;112(S5):S504-S507. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306898.
7
Advancing Reproductive Health Equity Through a New Contraceptive Access Initiative.
Am J Public Health. 2022 Jun;112(S5):S500-S503. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306899.
9
The Colorado Initiative to Reduce Unintended Pregnancy: Contraceptive Access and Impact on Reproductive Health.
Am J Public Health. 2022 Jun;112(S5):S532-S536. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306891.
10
Scaling Up Evidence-Based Practices in Contraceptive Access Initiatives.
Am J Public Health. 2022 Jun;112(S5):S473-S477. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306824.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验