Raffagnato Alessia, Rossaro Maria Paola, Piretti Elena, Galdiolo Laura, Pelizza Maria Federica, Sartori Stefano, Nosadini Margherita, Toldo Irene
Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatric Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
IRCCS, Institute of Neurological Sciences of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Pediatr Neurol. 2025 Apr;165:22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2024.12.013. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
To deepen the role of acupuncture as preventive treatment for pediatric primary headaches in children and adolescents and to understand if acupuncture is more effective than sham acupuncture or pharmacologic preventive treatment, acupuncture tolerability, and beneficial effect on psychiatric comorbidities.
A critical literature review was performed. Following PRISMA guidelines, all reports published (PubMed, 1982-2023) were considered. PICOS method was applied for paper selection. Efficacy measures were reduction of headache frequency, duration, and intensity compared with baseline, and, if available, with a control group. We also aimed to describe treatment protocols, the reason for choosing this treatment, patients' perception of acupuncture experience, and acupuncture's impact on headache comorbidity and general functioning.
Five of 90 papers were selected, corresponding to a population of 229 children/adolescents (zero to 21 years). Among these, two controlled studies evaluated reduction of headache frequency, intensity, and duration. True acupuncture versus placebo significantly reduced headache frequency (reduction of seven to eight headache days/month versus zero to one headache days/month, respectively), intensity on a visual analog scale (5.4 points compared with 1.6 points in placebo group), and headache duration. Tolerability data on acupuncture were favorable. Acupuncture experience was positively perceived by most patients, improved pain-related total interference in functioning, and reduced anxiety levels.
The few studies dealing with acupuncture as preventive treatment of pediatric primary headaches, despite their methodologic limitations, highlighted its efficacy. Further detailed studies are needed.
为深化针灸在儿童和青少年原发性头痛预防治疗中的作用,了解针灸是否比假针灸或药物预防性治疗更有效、针灸的耐受性以及对精神共病的有益效果。
进行了一项批判性文献综述。遵循PRISMA指南,纳入了所有已发表的报告(PubMed,1982 - 2023年)。采用PICOS方法进行论文筛选。疗效指标为与基线相比头痛频率、持续时间和强度的降低情况,如有对照组则与对照组进行比较。我们还旨在描述治疗方案、选择该治疗的原因、患者对针灸体验的感知以及针灸对头痛共病和总体功能的影响。
从90篇论文中筛选出5篇,涉及229名儿童/青少年(0至21岁)。其中,两项对照研究评估了头痛频率、强度和持续时间的降低情况。真针灸与安慰剂相比,显著降低了头痛频率(分别从每月7至8天头痛降至每月0至1天头痛)、视觉模拟量表上的强度(5.4分,而安慰剂组为1.6分)以及头痛持续时间。针灸的耐受性数据良好。大多数患者对针灸体验有积极的感受,改善了疼痛相关的功能总体干扰,并降低了焦虑水平。
尽管存在方法学上的局限性,但少数关于针灸作为儿童原发性头痛预防性治疗的研究突出了其疗效。还需要进一步的详细研究。