Chan Wing Ki, Pitt Stephanie, Smorenburg Herbert, Wolk Alicja, Lissner Lauren
Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg, 40530 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 40530 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Nutrients. 2025 Jan 24;17(3):421. doi: 10.3390/nu17030421.
The European Commission has called for a harmonised front-of-package nutritional label (FOPNL) system in the European region. The Keyhole is a widely adopted positive FOPNL used in several Nordic countries. The Nutri-Score is a five-level graded FOPNL, more recently introduced in Western Europe. Both FOPNLs are supported by intrinsically different nutrient profiling systems (NPSs). A third NPS is the Choices NPS, which originally supported a positive FOPNL similar to the Keyhole and has been expanded into a five-level NPS.
The main objective of this study was to investigate the overall alignment between both the Choices and Nutri-Score multi-level NPSs and the Keyhole NPS. Furthermore, food group-based alignment was analysed to understand the main sources of misalignment.
In this study, we extracted 1064 food/drink items from the food and beverage database of the Swedish Food Administration. All products were assessed according to all three NPSs, and alignment was assessed, using the Keyhole NPS as a recommendation-based reference. Two definitions of alignment were examined-healthier (more lenient, i.e., two highest grades) and healthiest (stricter, i.e., only the highest grade).
The overall alignment between the Choices and Keyhole NPSs was similar to that between the Nutri-Score and Keyhole NPSs (89% and 85% alignment under the healthiest definition, i.e., stricter). However, two food groups showed poor alignment between the Nutri-Score NPS and the Keyhole NPS (~60%). Under the healthier (more lenient) definition, the alignment for both the Choices and Nutri-Score systems with the Keyhole system was lower (86% and 79%).
The alignments and misalignments between the Choices/Nutri-Score systems and the Keyhole system prompt important considerations for future developments of FOPNL systems for the Nordic countries. Extending the Keyhole NPS to include a multi-level criterion could potentially help consumers identify healthier choices, even for less nutritious foods.
欧盟委员会呼吁在欧洲地区建立统一的包装正面营养标签(FOPNL)系统。“锁孔”标签是北欧几个国家广泛采用的一种正面FOPNL。“营养评分”是一种五级分级FOPNL,最近在西欧推出。这两种FOPNL都由本质上不同的营养成分分析系统(NPS)提供支持。第三种NPS是“选择”NPS,它最初支持一种类似于“锁孔”的正面FOPNL,现已扩展为五级NPS。
本研究的主要目的是调查“选择”和“营养评分”多级NPS与“锁孔”NPS之间的总体一致性。此外,还分析了基于食物类别的一致性,以了解不一致的主要来源。
在本研究中,我们从瑞典食品管理局的食品和饮料数据库中提取了1064种食品/饮料项目。所有产品均根据所有三种NPS进行评估,并以“锁孔”NPS作为基于推荐的参考来评估一致性。研究了两种一致性定义——更健康(更宽松,即两个最高等级)和最健康(更严格,即仅最高等级)。
“选择”NPS与“锁孔”NPS之间的总体一致性与“营养评分”NPS与“锁孔”NPS之间的总体一致性相似(在最健康定义下,即更严格的情况下,一致性分别为89%和85%)。然而,有两类食物在“营养评分”NPS与“锁孔”NPS之间的一致性较差(约60%)。在更健康(更宽松)的定义下,“选择”和“营养评分”系统与“锁孔”系统的一致性较低(分别为86%和79%)。
“选择”/“营养评分”系统与“锁孔”系统之间的一致性和不一致性促使人们对北欧国家FOPNL系统的未来发展进行重要思考。扩展“锁孔”NPS以纳入多级标准可能有助于消费者识别更健康的选择,即使是对于营养较少的食物。