Borkowska Aneta Maria, Chmiel Paulina, Rutkowski Piotr, Telejko Maria, Spałek Mateusz Jacek
Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Roentgena Str. 5, Warsaw 02-781, Poland.
Department of Radiotherapy I, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2025 Feb 12;17:17588359251316189. doi: 10.1177/17588359251316189. eCollection 2025.
The evidence base for the management of oligoprogression in metastatic melanoma (MM) is limited. To our knowledge, this study presents the first analysis of the local benefit (LB) of radiotherapy combined with hyperthermia during systemic treatment in this diagnosis.
Patients with oligoprogressive MM who were treated with radiotherapy (RTH) combined with hyperthermia (HT) at a melanoma center between 2019 and 2023 were evaluated. Oligoprogression was defined as up to five progressive metastases. Inclusion criteria was the availability of dimensions assessment of the lesion subjected to RTH before and after treatment, patients without follow-up imaging after radiotherapy were excluded. The benefit of RTH + HT was evaluated in terms of local control (LC) rates and LB rates. LC was defined as the percentage of patients who met the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) criteria for stable disease (SD), partial response (PR), and complete response (CR). LB was defined as the proportion of patients who met the PR and CR criteria. In addition, overall survival (OS) rates were estimated. The association between status, age, concomitant systemic treatment, radiation total dose, and biologically effective dose and LC was estimated. Data regarding adverse effects associated with RTH + HT were compiled. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and log-rank tests and were used to compare between groups.
In total, 101 patients were included in the study, the median follow-up was 15.3 months (14-18 months). There were 56.4% (-) and 43.6% (+) patients. Most patients (71.3%) were irradiated during immunotherapy, 10.9% received concomitant BRAF and MEK inhibitors, and 3.9% had chemotherapy. LC and LB medians were not reached at the time of analysis. The 1- and 2-year LC rates were 93.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 88.1%-99.3%) and 88.3% (95% CI: 79.9%-97.6%), respectively. The 1- and 2-year LB rates were 87.5% (95% CI: 80.5%-95.2%) and 78.1% (95% CI: 67.9%-89.9%), respectively. The mean reduction in irradiated tumor size across the entire cohort was 72%. The mOS from radiotherapy was not achieved at the time of our analysis, accordingly 1- and 2-year OS rates were 100% and 95% (95% CI: 90.4%-99.9%). None of the evaluated factors influenced LC among patients.
Hyperthermia with radiotherapy is an effective treatment for patients with oligoprogressive melanoma. This approach has resulted in excellent LC.
转移性黑色素瘤(MM)中寡进展管理的证据基础有限。据我们所知,本研究首次分析了在该诊断的全身治疗期间放疗联合热疗的局部获益(LB)。
对2019年至2023年期间在一家黑色素瘤中心接受放疗(RTH)联合热疗(HT)治疗的寡进展性MM患者进行评估。寡进展定义为最多五个进展性转移灶。纳入标准是治疗前后对接受RTH的病灶进行尺寸评估,排除放疗后未进行后续影像学检查的患者。根据局部控制(LC)率和LB率评估RTH + HT的获益。LC定义为符合实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST 1.1)中疾病稳定(SD)、部分缓解(PR)和完全缓解(CR)标准的患者百分比。LB定义为符合PR和CR标准的患者比例。此外,估计总生存率(OS)。评估状态、年龄、同期全身治疗、放疗总剂量和生物等效剂量与LC之间的关联。收集与RTH + HT相关的不良反应数据。使用Kaplan-Meier估计器和对数秩检验进行生存分析,并用于组间比较。
本研究共纳入101例患者,中位随访时间为15.3个月(14 - 18个月)。患者中(-)占56.4%,(+)占43.6%。大多数患者(71.3%)在免疫治疗期间接受放疗,10.9%接受BRAF和MEK抑制剂联合治疗,3.9%接受化疗。分析时未达到LC和LB的中位数。1年和2年LC率分别为93.5%(95%置信区间(CI):88.1% - 99.3%)和88.3%(95% CI:79.9% - 97.6%)。1年和2年LB率分别为87.5%(95% CI:8.05% - 95.2%)和78.1%(95% CI:67.9% - 89.9%)。整个队列中接受放疗的肿瘤大小平均缩小72%。在我们分析时未达到放疗后的中位总生存期,因此1年和2年OS率分别为100%和95%(95% CI:90.4% - 99.9%)。评估的因素均未影响患者的LC。
放疗联合热疗是寡进展性黑色素瘤患者的有效治疗方法。这种方法已产生优异的LC。